In stablecoin liquidity management, many teams have fallen into a common pitfall—权益折旧 (equity depreciation). It sounds unfamiliar, but in reality, it’s quite powerful.



What exactly is going on? slisBNB’s staking period extension causes your capital occupation costs to continuously increase; clisBNB’s circulating value shrinks after the project enters a recession phase; LISTA’s governance weight is also diluted due to ecosystem changes. These depreciations seem to happen slowly, but over time, they can eat away a significant portion of returns.

Data speaks: teams using traditional static strategies typically lose about 15%-20% of their earnings annually due to权益折旧. One team, because they didn’t keep up with changes in LISTA’s governance weight, saw their voting power shrink by 40% in half a year, not to mention the worst case—their quarterly earnings were cut by $52,000.

What’s the solution? Active hedging. An innovative team proposed an权益折旧 reverse management system, dynamically adjusting the positions of three types of权益 to both preserve and increase value. They ran a pilot with a $500,000 fund pool, achieving an annualized return of 72.5%, with a maximum drawdown of only 1.05%, and over 68% of the extra gains came from depreciation hedging.

The core difference is this—passive acceptance vs. active intervention. While others are still debating entry timing, smart teams are already managing the decay risks at every step with precision.
LISTA-2,55%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
bridgeOopsvip
· 01-15 17:40
72.5% annualized sounds great, but can this reverse management system really be replicated, or is it just another survivor bias story?
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_ptsdvip
· 01-14 19:54
72.5% annualized return sounds great, but can this data really be replicated? Or is it just the old routine of pilot data again?
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorervip
· 01-12 23:53
Another overlooked detail by most people: the pit of equity depreciation. I hadn't thought of this before. An annual loss rate of 15%-20% is truly outrageous. A 40% reduction in half a year in voting power—how passive is that? We still need to take proactive actions. An annualized return of 72.5% sounds exaggerated, but the core logic is actually not to just lie around and wait. Why does it seem like those who make money now are the ones who fuss over details? Lazy people have long been completely exploited. This idea is a bit complex; it requires real-time tracking of weight changes. Can automated hedging really achieve such high returns? I need to think carefully about equity dilution. It feels like I might also be being slowly drained. Depreciation hedging accounts for 68% of the returns, which means the remaining part is the real alpha. Where did this data come from?
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaservip
· 01-12 23:52
Damn, this equity depreciation is really quietly eating into the returns, losing 15-20%. Who can withstand that?
View OriginalReply0
tx_or_didn't_happenvip
· 01-12 23:52
72.5% annualized? This number is obtained, probably using that same "dynamic hedging" marketing spiel. The actual drawdown wouldn't be just 1.05%.
View OriginalReply0
FreeMintervip
· 01-12 23:48
A 72.5% annualized return sounds a bit unrealistic, but the depreciation of equity is indeed often overlooked by most people. I've fallen for it myself before.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemurvip
· 01-12 23:44
72.5% annualized return with only 1% drawdown? Is this data real? It feels a bit too fantastic.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller69vip
· 01-12 23:25
Wait, can depreciation of equity really eat up 15-20% of the returns? Why haven't I noticed this before?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)