2026-01-12 23:23:10

The community clearly said they didn't need a launchpad, but the project team still pushed one out. And the result? Token holders sold off even before the buyback started. Ironically, the features you painstakingly built ended up signaling retail investors to panic sell. This is a typical case of misalignment between Web3 project teams and market expectations—sometimes listening to the community's voice is much better than working behind closed doors. The market has already voted with its feet.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MevWhisperer

· 01-15 18:24

The community has already said no, but you insist on doing it yourself. Aren't you digging your own grave?

View OriginalReply0

MevHunter

· 01-15 11:09

The community all says to stop, but you insist on being clever on your own, you deserve to be your own bag holder.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMigrant

· 01-15 06:41

The community says don't do it, but if you insist, isn't that just digging your own grave?

View OriginalReply0

LootboxPhobia

· 01-14 05:21

The community all says no, but you still insist on doing one. This move is really awesome haha

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 01-12 23:52

The project's operation is truly outrageous. The community has already said no, yet they insist on pushing forward. Isn't this just digging their own grave? --- Another example of closed-door development. Do they listen to the community or not, everyone? --- The launchpad's launch has instead become a sell signal. The plot twist is brilliantly written. --- Holders are voting with their feet. This is the most straightforward market feedback. --- Sometimes, focusing on market sentiment is more effective than developing features. This lesson is painfully clear. --- The community's words are ignored, only to be educated by the market later. Old tricks again. --- People buy back before launch and then run. What does that mean? It shows that everyone isn't interested in this setup. --- The irony is that the more effort they put in, the more it backfires. This launchpad has become a "escape route" indicator. --- The project team and market expectations have missed a critical threshold by a hair.

View OriginalReply0

RunWithRugs

· 01-12 23:44

The community says there's no need, but you still insist on coming. Isn't this just digging your own grave?

View OriginalReply0

GraphGuru

· 01-12 23:42

The community says if you insist on doing it, aren't you just digging your own grave? --- Another example of closed-door development; if you don't listen, you'll suffer the consequences. --- I knew the project was doomed the moment Launchpad came out; market reactions are the most honest. --- Project teams really should learn to listen to community feedback; pushing hard will only accelerate their demise. --- Who still doesn't believe the market will speak these days? The immediate order cancellations already show the reaction clearly. --- The irony is that what was meant to add functionality turned into a trigger for panic. --- Holders' actions speak louder than any announcement; this time, they've learned a lesson. --- Why insist on going against the community? Isn't that the main misunderstanding in Web3? --- The buyback hasn't even started, and the project is already deserted; the team should reflect on themselves.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyMiner

· 01-12 23:39

It's the same old story, whatever the community says is useless.

View OriginalReply0

RiddleMaster

· 01-12 23:35

The community has already said no, but you insist on going ahead. Isn't this just digging your own grave?

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-12 23:31

According to on-chain voting data, this case perfectly illustrates the limitations of Token Weighted Voting—community opposition signals are overwhelming, yet the project team still ignores them, a typical case of misaligned incentives.

View OriginalReply0