Institutional capital is eager for on-chain efficiency, but once real money is involved, they turn away. Where is the problem? Simply put, it's three words: lack of trust.
Moving securities worth billions of euros onto the chain, traditional financial institutions face three major hurdles:
First is privacy issues. Public blockchains are transparent, which sounds ideal but is disastrous for institutions—your trading strategies and holdings data are visible to the world. Who dares to play that game?
Second is compliance issues. Regulatory requirements like KYC and AML are almost nonexistent in the current on-chain environment. Audit trails are missing, and when problems arise, no responsible party can be found.
Third is technical costs. Building a dedicated chain that is both secure and compliant? That’s an astronomical number, and in the end, it becomes an isolated island.
Dusk’s approach is different. It doesn’t try to do everything at once but designs a modular system to address these challenges one by one. The core concept is "compliant privacy"—protecting data confidentiality while allowing regulators to see what they need to see.
The operation logic of the Dusk ecosystem is a three-layer progression. The bottom layer is application access; through DuskEVM’s mainnet upgrade in mid-January this year, developers can deploy privacy applications directly, lowering the entry barrier. The middle layer is the protocol-level privacy protection mechanism, ensuring that sensitive business information is not leaked. The top layer is the compliance audit interface, providing regulators with necessary visualization permissions while maintaining user privacy boundaries.
Dusk coin (DUSK) plays a role similar to a value measure for this system. When RWA truly moves onto the chain at scale, the importance of this infrastructure that balances privacy and compliance will be revalued.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 01-15 17:21
Nice words, but can this "compliance privacy" really reassure major institutions? I'm a bit skeptical.
Building a dedicated chain into an isolated island, using a public chain with explosive privacy issues—can Dusk find a way through this? Let's see if it can truly pass the review.
A bunch of projects boast extravagantly, but aren't they all just abandoned in the end? Is this time different? Let's wait and see.
Privacy and compliance are inherently contradictory; insisting on both is unrealistic—there's no such good thing in the world.
RWA on-chain has been hyped for several years. Only when real institutions start making large investments will we see the true story.
View OriginalReply0
ZkProofPudding
· 01-15 14:30
That's right. Traditional finance just wants the cheapness of blockchain without the cost of transparency, it's hilarious.
Institutions want privacy, compliance, and to save money—where in the world can you find such a good deal? Dusk's three-layer design is indeed interesting, but whether it can truly be implemented depends on the outcome.
Privacy + compliance as a combo punch, it feels like someone is finally seriously considering this issue.
Oh my, there are so many issues with putting securities on the chain. No wonder institutions are bickering.
Dusk's modular approach is quite good, but when will RWA truly explode? It still feels like we have to wait.
I'm a bit curious about the compliance audit interface. How do regulators see it while user privacy isn't leaked? It's a bit magical.
So, the future of on-chain finance depends on solutions that are between centralized and decentralized.
The value positioning of DUSK tokens still depends on the scale of RWA; otherwise, the current hype is a bit premature.
The three big obstacles really block the path of many financial institutions. Whoever can truly solve them will win.
This is the direction Web3 should take in the financial field—finding the balance point between privacy and compliance.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 01-15 04:02
Speaking of which, those traditional finance folks always say they want to go on-chain, but in their hearts, it's all about the money. Privacy compliance issues are numerous; at the end of the day, they're just afraid of risks. Who dares to gamble?
Dusk's modular approach is somewhat interesting; can privacy and compliance truly be compatible? I'm a bit skeptical.
As for RWA on-chain, it still feels like a pseudo-demand...
Wait, has DuskEVM mainnet been upgraded? Why haven't I heard much news...
Institutions are always in a wait-and-see mode; the day large-scale funds actually enter is still far off.
Building a dedicated chain into an isolated island really hits the point—no one wants to be locked out.
Privacy and transparency are inherently opposed; anyone claiming they can balance both is just fooling themselves.
DUSK's pricing logic sounds good, but will RWA really explode? That's a bit uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 01-14 17:25
It sounds great, but do institutions really dare to pour money in? I remain skeptical.
Traditional finance has been playing by its rules for hundreds of years; it can't be changed by a few privacy agreements, right?
Compliance is the key; otherwise, it's just a castle in the air.
Dusk's logic sounds good, but it depends on whether it can truly be implemented.
It feels like another project that promises a lot but delivers little.
If you ask me, wait until large institutions actually make significant investments. Right now, it's all about PPTs and whitepapers.
Can privacy and compliance truly be balanced? I have my doubts.
No matter how loud the hype, without real major client cases, it's all just talk.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobber
· 01-12 23:52
It's the same old story... Institutions are just afraid of exposing their cards. Compliance and privacy sound appealing, but in reality? It's just a shell swap.
Honestly, privacy and transparency are inherently contradictory. Dusk wants to have it both ways... Will regulators really be satisfied?
Capital is always like this. As soon as real money is involved, they disappear. Blame the chain? Or blame their own guilt?
What can DuskEVM upgrade really change? The key is that no one believes it.
Feels like they're just telling stories again. The day RWA is massively on-chain is still a long way off.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGriller
· 01-12 23:52
It's easy to speak nicely, but when it comes to actually spending money, can this set of solutions really be accepted by institutions? That's still a question mark.
Looking at Dusk's plan, it seems good, but I'm worried it might just be empty talk in the end. Can privacy and compliance truly be achieved simultaneously?
Compliance + Privacy... sounds like a win-win, but in reality, it's often a trade-off between the two.
So the key is whether institutions are really willing to use it; otherwise, even the best design is useless.
I believe in the three-tier progressive logic, but I don't believe anyone would really invest hundreds of millions into it.
Wait, does this mean Dusk aims to become the infrastructure for RWA on-chain? Then DUSK should rise in value.
But the problem is, who can guarantee that this system is truly foolproof?
It still feels like the old way—telling stories first, and only after going on-chain will we find out how many pitfalls there are.
Balancing privacy and regulation is indeed a challenge, but Dusk's approach should be correct.
In the end, it's a gamble on RWA, but the question is, when will that day come?
View OriginalReply0
TokenCreatorOP
· 01-12 23:51
That's right, mouse trading is the real reason they don't dare to go on-chain.
The hypocrisy of these institutions is truly remarkable; they talk about efficiency but their actions are full of risk.
Compliance and privacy are indeed pseudo-issues; if regulators really scrutinized, would they still call it privacy?
However, Dusk's approach is somewhat interesting; I just don't know how far it can go.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWanderingPoet
· 01-12 23:50
Well said, privacy and compliance are indeed unavoidable hurdles.
Dusk's modular solution sounds pretty good, but can it really reassure traditional finance?
In my opinion, the key still depends on whether the auditing interface can truly be implemented; otherwise, it's just talk.
Institutions fear most that when something happens, no one is responsible. What's the use of just shouting about privacy and compliance?
Will the DUSK token also follow the trend and hype up a wave, then disappear without further development...
RWA on-chain is so popular, why is it still mostly talk and little action?
Honestly, it's a trust issue. No matter how good the technical solution is, no one dares to bet on it.
When a large amount of funds truly go on-chain, I will believe then.
View OriginalReply0
ContractBugHunter
· 01-12 23:47
You're right, big institutions just want cheap options and the ability to move quickly. Privacy compliance is indeed a bottleneck, and Dusk's modular approach is quite practical. However, RWA (Real-World Assets) still has a long way to go before it becomes mainstream...
---
Privacy and compliance are inherently conflicting; Dusk's ability to balance both is the real skill. But on the other hand, will institutions really pay for this?
---
It seems like a solution is being worked out, but it still feels somewhat idealistic. Regulatory preferences are always changing—does hardcoding on-chain really work?
---
The third mountain, the technical cost, seems to be the most painful. Even the best solution is pointless if the costs are too high.
---
The compliance audit interface is quite interesting; at last, someone has thought of a way to make regulators comfortable. Whether DUSK can succeed depends on whether this logic can truly be implemented.
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalker
· 01-12 23:44
Well said, institutions are just like that—they want the cake and to eat it too. Privacy and compliance are indeed deadlocks; I think Dusk's approach is viable.
---
Really, big capital is always double-standard like this—demanding efficiency and transparency, but when it comes to their own money, they start talking about privacy.
---
Balancing compliance and privacy is the key, but can it really be achieved? I have some doubts.
---
The three major hurdles really hit home, especially the cost aspect—building private chains is just a variant of cutting the leeks.
---
Wait, has DuskEVM been upgraded? So fast—how's the developer experience? Has anyone tried it?
---
Modular systems sound good, but I'm worried it will just end up being all talk and no action.
---
Ultimately, the issue boils down to trust. No matter how much innovation happens on the chain, institutions will still feel unsafe—it's very typical.
---
If DUSK can truly solve these pain points, the revaluation of its value is only a matter of time.
Institutional capital is eager for on-chain efficiency, but once real money is involved, they turn away. Where is the problem? Simply put, it's three words: lack of trust.
Moving securities worth billions of euros onto the chain, traditional financial institutions face three major hurdles:
First is privacy issues. Public blockchains are transparent, which sounds ideal but is disastrous for institutions—your trading strategies and holdings data are visible to the world. Who dares to play that game?
Second is compliance issues. Regulatory requirements like KYC and AML are almost nonexistent in the current on-chain environment. Audit trails are missing, and when problems arise, no responsible party can be found.
Third is technical costs. Building a dedicated chain that is both secure and compliant? That’s an astronomical number, and in the end, it becomes an isolated island.
Dusk’s approach is different. It doesn’t try to do everything at once but designs a modular system to address these challenges one by one. The core concept is "compliant privacy"—protecting data confidentiality while allowing regulators to see what they need to see.
The operation logic of the Dusk ecosystem is a three-layer progression. The bottom layer is application access; through DuskEVM’s mainnet upgrade in mid-January this year, developers can deploy privacy applications directly, lowering the entry barrier. The middle layer is the protocol-level privacy protection mechanism, ensuring that sensitive business information is not leaked. The top layer is the compliance audit interface, providing regulators with necessary visualization permissions while maintaining user privacy boundaries.
Dusk coin (DUSK) plays a role similar to a value measure for this system. When RWA truly moves onto the chain at scale, the importance of this infrastructure that balances privacy and compliance will be revalued.