When we talk about the next stage of decentralized finance, many people are still focusing on promises of high yields. But the real opportunity may lie deeper—comprehensive upgrades in capital efficiency.



Recently, a fascinating shift has occurred in the DeFi ecosystem. Represented by some emerging protocols, they are no longer solely competing for staking yields but are shifting their focus toward the overall utilization efficiency of assets.

The most direct manifestation is the deep integration of liquidity staking and collateralized lending. Imagine your crypto assets earning staking rewards while also being convertible into low-interest loans when needed—this changes users' understanding of assets. It’s no longer a binary choice of one or the other, but enabling each asset to realize greater value.

The core value of this model lies in activating the dormant productivity of crypto assets. Users retain ownership of their assets but can gain credit capacity through the protocol’s mechanism design. In a sense, this is like equipping crypto assets with a "financial engine."

Interestingly, such innovations have gained recognition from mainstream ecosystems. Strategic support from multiple leading institutions and protocols reflects a market demand for such underlying financial infrastructure.

Of course, while efficiency is improved, risk management cannot be relaxed. Over-collateralization, on-chain transparent rules, and mechanized risk control—these elements are indispensable. Community discussions also show that users are gradually shifting from purely pursuing yields to deeper understanding of mechanisms and risk assessment.

From an ecosystem perspective, open collaboration is also crucial. Cross-protocol interactions and upstream-downstream connections are ultimately necessary to create a truly seamless user experience.

My view is that these foundational protocols focused on optimizing capital operation efficiency may be the key puzzle piece for DeFi to achieve large-scale adoption. They may not generate the most eye-catching market news, but they lay the groundwork for the long-term stability and sustainability of the entire ecosystem. Paying attention to industry evolution means not overlooking those projects that meticulously refine fundamental elements behind the scenes.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-5854de8bvip
· 01-15 05:00
To be honest, those still chasing high APY have probably been cut already... This article has some real insights; capital efficiency is the true value.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrantvip
· 01-13 10:06
Well said, real returns are not in those flashy APYs, but in assets that can truly become liquid. Wait, do we need to take another look at the risks of over-collateralization? The idea of liquid staking + lending should have been around for a while; why is it only now becoming popular? When every asset can "work," that's efficiency. The previous approach of just placing orders or borrowing was too primitive. Infrastructure may not be sexy but it's important, I agree. However, there are only a few protocols that can truly survive, it still depends on actual use cases. This is what Web3 needs—activating dormant assets instead of playing the Ponzi game of constantly chasing yields. I agree that risk control needs to keep up, but honestly, the transparency on-chain is still uneven.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractRebelvip
· 01-13 08:14
To be honest, this set of theories sounds good, but how many have actually been successfully implemented? Liquidity staking combined with lending sounds great... but in practice, liquidation risks can bankrupt you. The key still depends on whose mechanism design is solid enough; otherwise, it's just another game of cutting leeks. Efficiency, right? I feel like it's just a disguised way of stacking leverage. Don't just focus on the infrastructure story; let's see what the real data says. --- The real question is, can over-collateralization withstand extreme market conditions? On-chain transparency ≠ risk elimination. --- It's not that they're wrong, but these types of projects are indeed easy to overlook — but the reasons for being overlooked are also worth pondering. --- It seems everyone talks about long-term value, but who dares to really put funds in and try in the short term? --- Integration is integration, but what about the vulnerabilities in cross-protocol interactions? These details are often lightly touched upon in articles.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayervip
· 01-12 23:51
Lax risk management still leads to crashes; I've seen too many protocols that start off hyped up and end up zeroed out.
View OriginalReply0
ShadowStakervip
· 01-12 23:51
ngl, the "capital efficiency" framing is just fancy talk for recursively re-hypothecating assets until nobody actually knows what's collateralizing what anymore. seen this movie before.
Reply0
FlatlineTradervip
· 01-12 23:48
The selling points sound good, but where is the real data? Still just telling stories, the actual operation is full of pitfalls. This is just a fancy version of leverage, don't be fooled by the packaging. Low-interest loans? Don't make me laugh, when has on-chain ever been cheap? The more complex the protocol, the greater the risk, and it still depends on whether you can survive until the next bull market. It's all talk and hype, ultimately just KPI-driven routines. It's indeed interesting, but risk management is fundamentally unreliable. It's just a liquidity illusion; you have to run at critical moments.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebelvip
· 01-12 23:48
After all, it still depends on whether anyone will actually use it Being able to earn staking rewards while borrowing? Sounds good, but how high are the stacked risks? Efficiency upgrades are great, but don't come with another wave of "innovations" to harvest the leeks again
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdroppervip
· 01-12 23:46
That's what they say, but how many actually dare to put all their assets in?
View OriginalReply0
Rekt_Recoveryvip
· 01-12 23:46
ngl this efficiency angle hits different after i got liquidated chasing yield like a degen... capital utilization > apy promises, learned that the hard way lmao
Reply0
LeekCuttervip
· 01-12 23:41
Exactly, the underlying infrastructure projects are too easily overlooked. Liquid staking combined with lending has truly changed the game. Compared to those days when everyone was hyping high yields, I prefer these quietly profitable protocols. Risk management really needs to be prioritized; otherwise, even high capital efficiency is pointless. Ultimately, it depends on who can provide a smooth user experience, as cross-protocol interoperability is the future.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)