The combination of privacy asset protocols and compliant exchanges is opening up a special business channel.
As a privacy asset protocol, Zedger uses its own tokens to pay gas fees for issuing and managing securitized assets. Meanwhile, NPEX, as a compliant exchange under the MiCA framework, has positioned its core utility token as the cornerstone of the ecosystem — not only for fee settlement but also supporting staking and on-chain governance. This design provides the token with dual demand support, from infrastructure layer to application layer.
In the development roadmap for 2025–2026, the practicality of tokenomics is being enhanced to the extreme. Gas consumption covers the entire lifecycle of RWA — from asset tokenization, management and operations, to on-chain clearing and settlement, with each stage generating real fee demands. The staking mechanism incentivizes nodes to maintain the network continuously through rewards, while the Hyperstaking feature allows ZK to customize logic for privacy-preserving profit distribution.
The policy benefits provided by the European MiCA framework are being unleashed. Over 300M+ euros in assets have been tokenized on-chain, with trading activity driving a rapid increase in gas demand. Meanwhile, the staking lock-up rate continues to rise, gradually tightening the supply side, and deflationary pressure is strengthening the token’s value support. The fixed supply cap of 1 billion tokens, combined with high circulation design, completely eliminates additional inflation risks.
From a longer-term perspective, the RWA market size is evolving towards trillions. The unique positioning of privacy + compliance allows this ecosystem token to capture core traffic. Gas consumption and staking APY form a dual-driven cycle, while the decreasing emission mechanism further ensures scarcity. By 2026, when the securitization platform is fully launched, the competition for dominance in compliant on-chain securities will intensify, and current valuation expectations may need to be reassessed.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaOnTheRun
· 01-15 22:45
Wow, 300M euros already on the chain? This is the real RWA narrative.
Honestly, the gas consumption throughout the entire lifecycle is indeed excellent, much more reliable than simple staking incentives.
Tight supply + deflationary expectations, I believe in this logic.
Is the trillion-dollar RWA market really coming, brothers?
What will the competition in 2026 look like... The current price might really be the bottom.
However, whether privacy + compliance can truly be implemented depends on subsequent execution.
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleeper
· 01-15 09:46
€300M on the chain, staking lock-up rate skyrocketing, this pace is really unsustainable.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterBearish
· 01-12 23:51
It's the same story of privacy + compliance again, getting a bit tired of hearing it.
The real question is whether gas consumption can be sustained. 300 million euros sounds like a lot, but in the entire RWA ecosystem, it's just average.
I'll believe this deflationary logic only halfway; mainly, it depends on whether trading volume can keep up later.
Let's wait until 2026 when it launches. For now, the hype is a bit overblown and somewhat虚.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 01-12 23:50
Privacy + compliance this combo is indeed interesting, but can gas consumption really support such a large imagination space?
300 million euros sounds impressive, but it all depends on the depth of the transactions.
The deflationary logic is good, but I'm worried no one will use it by then.
Double-wheel drive sounds nice, but whether it's stable or not depends on the ecosystem activity.
A trillion RWA is a big pie, but is it still too early...
I don't deny this approach, but 2026 will be the real test.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaBrain
· 01-12 23:45
This tokenomics design indeed has some substance; the dual-driven logic has been successfully implemented.
The combination of privacy asset protocols and compliant exchanges is opening up a special business channel.
As a privacy asset protocol, Zedger uses its own tokens to pay gas fees for issuing and managing securitized assets. Meanwhile, NPEX, as a compliant exchange under the MiCA framework, has positioned its core utility token as the cornerstone of the ecosystem — not only for fee settlement but also supporting staking and on-chain governance. This design provides the token with dual demand support, from infrastructure layer to application layer.
In the development roadmap for 2025–2026, the practicality of tokenomics is being enhanced to the extreme. Gas consumption covers the entire lifecycle of RWA — from asset tokenization, management and operations, to on-chain clearing and settlement, with each stage generating real fee demands. The staking mechanism incentivizes nodes to maintain the network continuously through rewards, while the Hyperstaking feature allows ZK to customize logic for privacy-preserving profit distribution.
The policy benefits provided by the European MiCA framework are being unleashed. Over 300M+ euros in assets have been tokenized on-chain, with trading activity driving a rapid increase in gas demand. Meanwhile, the staking lock-up rate continues to rise, gradually tightening the supply side, and deflationary pressure is strengthening the token’s value support. The fixed supply cap of 1 billion tokens, combined with high circulation design, completely eliminates additional inflation risks.
From a longer-term perspective, the RWA market size is evolving towards trillions. The unique positioning of privacy + compliance allows this ecosystem token to capture core traffic. Gas consumption and staking APY form a dual-driven cycle, while the decreasing emission mechanism further ensures scarcity. By 2026, when the securitization platform is fully launched, the competition for dominance in compliant on-chain securities will intensify, and current valuation expectations may need to be reassessed.