Seoul's enthusiasm for onchain culture financing is growing for good reason. Projects like Camp are reshaping how creative industries access capital—this goes beyond simple tokenization.
Consider the mechanics: a Bollywood production becomes the first major film financed entirely through onchain yield strategies via RWA (Real World Assets). Contributors earn 40% APY while receiving film credits, fundamentally changing how returns flow back to the creative community.
This model taps into a $3.5T market gap. Traditional film financing locks everyday investors out. RWA-backed structures democratize participation, letting anyone stake in culture's future. Contributors gain both financial yield and cultural ownership—no intermediaries.
The infrastructure shift matters more than hype. When studios can directly mint yield-bearing assets against production budgets, capital efficiency skyrockets. Geographic barriers dissolve. A film crew in Mumbai connects instantly with yield-seeking capital from Seoul to Singapore.
This isn't just fintech theater. It's rewiring how culture gets funded, distributed, and appreciated across borders.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-afe07a92
· 01-15 22:32
40% APY sounds crazy... but can this really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-14 02:53
ngl 40% APY sounds a bit too crazy... Can it really be stable?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fc
· 01-12 23:05
40% APY sounds outrageous, is it real or not... The idea of financing Bollywood movies on the blockchain sounds truly innovative, but how are the risks calculated?
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotDayLaborer
· 01-12 23:05
40% APY sounds too crazy... Can it really be that stable?
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlin
· 01-12 23:01
NGL, this RWA financing logic is a bit extreme, but with a 40% APY, are you really not afraid of getting chopped?
Seoul's enthusiasm for onchain culture financing is growing for good reason. Projects like Camp are reshaping how creative industries access capital—this goes beyond simple tokenization.
Consider the mechanics: a Bollywood production becomes the first major film financed entirely through onchain yield strategies via RWA (Real World Assets). Contributors earn 40% APY while receiving film credits, fundamentally changing how returns flow back to the creative community.
This model taps into a $3.5T market gap. Traditional film financing locks everyday investors out. RWA-backed structures democratize participation, letting anyone stake in culture's future. Contributors gain both financial yield and cultural ownership—no intermediaries.
The infrastructure shift matters more than hype. When studios can directly mint yield-bearing assets against production budgets, capital efficiency skyrockets. Geographic barriers dissolve. A film crew in Mumbai connects instantly with yield-seeking capital from Seoul to Singapore.
This isn't just fintech theater. It's rewiring how culture gets funded, distributed, and appreciated across borders.