2026-01-12 22:38:00

The interesting thing about PUMP2 is that—anyone can start a small market cap project for fun, and then, hey, 0.5% of the PUMP2 supply is locked into the liquidity pool. Every time you come up with a new idea or joke, you're actually adding value to this main token. Don't underestimate the power of this gameplay. The real driving force often comes from community engagement and creative collisions, which are the key to keeping the entire ecosystem active.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CafeMinor

· 01-15 14:20

Haha, I see this trick, the more excited the players are, the more vibrant the ecosystem becomes.

View OriginalReply0

Layer3Dreamer

· 01-14 22:59

theoretically speaking, if we map this onto recursive SNARKs logic... every meme launch is basically a state verification event that strengthens the parent chain's liquidity layer. the 0.5% lockup mechanism? that's genuinely elegant interoperability design. community participation *is* the cross-rollup bridge here.

Reply0

blocksnark

· 01-12 23:08

Hey, this set of logic is actually a huge liquidity vampire. Who can't see that?

View OriginalReply0

RektHunter

· 01-12 23:04

Oh no, I see through this trick. Basically, it's just arbitrage for profit.

View OriginalReply0

NullWhisperer

· 01-12 23:03

honestly the 0.5% lockup mechanism is actually pretty elegant—every shitpost literally feeds the liquidity pool. theoretically exploitable if you're clever about it, but that's beside the point. what's interesting here is the meta layer: community engagement *is* the product. risky as hell though, needs further review before treating it like sustainable mechanics.

Reply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 01-12 22:55

Hmm... 0.5% is being sunk into the liquidity pool. I've seen this tactic too many times. On the surface, it claims to be community-driven creativity, but in reality, it's users voluntarily supporting the main market makers. Those early addresses should be moving now.

View OriginalReply0