Do stablecoins really threaten bank deposits and lending? That's the concern banks keep raising.
Their argument centers on "deposit flight" and systemic stability risks. Sounds serious. But here's the thing—when you dig into the actual research, the story gets way more nuanced.
A CRA analysis dug into this and found something interesting: there's no statistically significant relationship between USDC adoption and bank deposit movements. Not exactly what the doom-and-gloom narratives were pushing.
This matters because the mainstream narrative around stablecoins destabilizing traditional finance often relies on worst-case assumptions rather than on-the-ground data. The research suggests the real-world impact is more complex and less catastrophic than the scare stories suggest.
Worth considering when the next round of "stablecoins are killing banking" takes over the headlines.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainSniper
· 1h ago
The data speaks for itself; that panic marketing tactic used by banks really needs to stop.
---
Using that same approach again? I’ve already said not to listen to the banks’ reckless claims.
---
USDC isn’t really a threat; the data is right there.
---
Public opinion vs. reality, they are always two different things.
---
Finally, someone has clarified this issue... Banks love to create anxiety.
---
The most ridiculous part is that everyone is spreading rumors, and no one is looking at the real data.
---
Stablecoins can’t kill traditional finance; this research is quite accurate.
View OriginalReply0
PumpingCroissant
· 10h ago
The data speaks for itself; once again, the banks are scaring themselves. USDC hasn't affected their deposit pools at all.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5854de8b
· 01-12 23:03
Data speaks louder than slogans; the so-called "stablecoin threat theory" from banks is basically just scaring people.
It's another "wolf coming" scenario. Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
QuietlyStaking
· 01-12 23:00
Data speaks louder than panic stories.
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugs
· 01-12 22:58
Data proves us right; the banks' old tricks are back again, haha
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larry
· 01-12 22:57
Data speaks volumes, and the bank's scare tactics have failed again.
View OriginalReply0
BtcDailyResearcher
· 01-12 22:54
The data speaks for itself, and the banks' "stablecoin threat theory" is about to break through again.
Honestly, I've long thought this narrative was just hype. Now that there's research backing it, they can speak more confidently.
Banks are really starting to resemble the children who cry wolf...
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 01-12 22:47
The old tricks of intimidating people at banks are so outdated... the data doesn't really support them anymore.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntress
· 01-12 22:41
Data shows that stablecoins don't have a significant impact on bank deposits, and banks are creating panic again.
Another capital game story; paying attention to the flow of these wallet addresses will make it clear.
After research and analysis, USDC adoption and deposit outflows are not significantly correlated, but that doesn't stop them from continuing to hype the concept.
Don't be greedy or follow the trend blindly; first, understand the background of the project team.
Do stablecoins really threaten bank deposits and lending? That's the concern banks keep raising.
Their argument centers on "deposit flight" and systemic stability risks. Sounds serious. But here's the thing—when you dig into the actual research, the story gets way more nuanced.
A CRA analysis dug into this and found something interesting: there's no statistically significant relationship between USDC adoption and bank deposit movements. Not exactly what the doom-and-gloom narratives were pushing.
This matters because the mainstream narrative around stablecoins destabilizing traditional finance often relies on worst-case assumptions rather than on-the-ground data. The research suggests the real-world impact is more complex and less catastrophic than the scare stories suggest.
Worth considering when the next round of "stablecoins are killing banking" takes over the headlines.