2026-01-12 22:34:42

U.S. lawmakers are pushing to modernize energy regulations as AI data centers consume massive amounts of power. The proposed DATA Act of 2026 aims to streamline outdated regulatory frameworks, allowing the nation to compete in AI technology development while protecting consumers from surging electricity costs. This regulatory modernization could reshape how computational infrastructure—from AI servers to blockchain networks—manages its energy footprint. The core tension: how to foster technological innovation without burdening households through higher utility bills. Industry observers see parallels with previous concerns around energy-intensive sectors, where regulatory clarity becomes essential for both economic growth and consumer protection.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerumSurfer

· 19h ago

The issue of AI burning electricity should have been addressed long ago, but how to do so without harming the common people is the real challenge.

View OriginalReply0

DataOnlooker

· 01-15 01:37

AI burning electricity is really intense; the household electricity bill is probably going to go up.

View OriginalReply0

RektHunter

· 01-14 17:16

Here we go again, about AI consuming electricity... I already said it, these big companies don't care about our electricity bills at all.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeVictim

· 01-12 23:04

The electricity cost for AI is really outrageous. My bill doubles every month.

View OriginalReply0

SleepTrader

· 01-12 23:04

AI data centers are really big electricity consumers. If this continues, the electricity bills for ordinary people will have to double.

View OriginalReply0

TokenEconomist

· 01-12 23:03

actually, let me break this down — the energy arbitrage here is way more complex than lawmakers realize. think of it like traditional utilities but now you've got competing demand curves from ai ops vs household consumption. the key variable? whether they actually price externalities correctly or just shuffle subsidies around. ceteris paribus, this gets messy fast lol

Reply0

metaverse_hermit

· 01-12 23:02

The issue of AI burning electricity ultimately still falls on ordinary people to pay for.

View OriginalReply0

ApeDegen

· 01-12 22:59

Here we go again, big tech companies consume electricity, and ordinary people foot the bill. This trick is old enough.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 01-12 22:52

Here comes the harvest again, AI consumes electricity, and the common people will foot the bill.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiChallenger

· 01-12 22:46

Really with this again? Data shows that throughout history, every energy-intensive industry claims "electricity costs won't rise," but what’s the result... the common people end up paying the bill. Interestingly, the real issue has never been about the rules or framework, but about who pays. Ironically, while shouting "protect consumers," they give the green light to enterprises. Do you believe it? I certainly don't. Wall Street folks are coming up with new tricks again, packaging it very nicely. Wait, can the DATA Act really control computing power and electricity consumption? I am skeptical. Are there specific data? Isn't this just a rehash of yesterday's crypto circle's "technological innovation must break old rules"... same soup, different spoon.

View OriginalReply0