2026-01-12 22:28:34

The project's token mechanism design is indeed worth paying attention to. By staking XP to control future rewards and access rights, it can effectively change player behavior — no longer simply farming tokens and immediately selling, but truly being integrated into the ecosystem. Holding $DN tokens will automatically prioritize you for all subsequent opportunities and rights. This cyclical feedback system makes long-term holding practically meaningful, rather than just speculation. From a tokenomics perspective, this design can build stronger ecosystem stickiness and is worth in-depth research.

DN-12,2%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BasementAlchemist

· 6h ago

The staking mechanism truly taps into human nature, preventing you from easily dumping your holdings. It's quite clever, as the priority rights directly lock in your desire to hold. The tokenomics design is pretty good, but I'm worried it might evolve into a Ponzi scheme later on...

View OriginalReply0

BackrowObserver

· 14h ago

This staking mechanism, in simple terms, is about locking people into the ecosystem. It's clever, but it depends on whether the rights and benefits can actually be delivered later on.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 18h ago

The staking mechanism is indeed interesting, but whether it can truly retain users depends on the subsequent execution.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiEscapeArtist

· 01-12 22:58

This mechanism does have some substance. I’ve really never seen the move of controlling permissions through staking XP. --- It’s another story of making money only through long-term holding. I always feel like this is just a trick to encourage HODL. --- $DN’s priority design is good, but how many can truly stick to not selling? --- Strong ecosystem stickiness, huh? Let’s see if the subsequent operations can keep up. --- What sounds good is a cyclical feedback; what’s less flattering is trapping you so you can’t run. Old tricks. --- I respect the staking mechanism to prevent market dumps, but the expected returns really need to be achievable.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullSurvivor

· 01-12 22:52

Hmm, the staking mechanism indeed has some substance, but it depends on whether anyone will actually hold in the future. The key is whether this design can withstand a decline; once the coin price crashes, it becomes a joke.

View OriginalReply0

Hash_Bandit

· 01-12 22:52

nah this staking mechanism lowkey reminds me of the old mining pool days... when people actually understood commitment instead of just chasing quick gainz

Reply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-12 22:46

According to the tokenomics model in the white paper, the incentive incompatibility issue of this staking mechanism has not been truly resolved—will the early holders' weight advantage inadvertently lead to a new oligopoly? Governance proposals indicate that this risk does exist.

View OriginalReply0

GasGrillMaster

· 01-12 22:36

This staking logic is indeed top-notch. It's not just about simple pie charts; it truly focuses on behavioral incentives.

View OriginalReply0