2026-01-12 22:27:44

A viable path forward might require structural separation for many AI-focused initiatives in the crypto space. Picture this: an independent nonprofit foundation handles the tech stack and community development—keeping things open-source and collaborative. Meanwhile, a dedicated commercialization lab manages IP rights and market positioning. This dual-entity model lets teams pursue innovation without conflict, balancing decentralized ethos against real-world business needs. Whether it's for Havelock AI or similar projects, the architecture question matters—how do you scale without compromising values?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

26 Likes

Reward
26
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearMarketLightning

· 01-15 16:44

Sounds good, but can this dual-track system really work... I always feel that in the end, they will hinder each other, and the promised decentralization ideal will vanish into thin air as soon as it hits the market.

View OriginalReply0

LostBetweenChains

· 01-15 09:26

The dual-track system sounds good, but in practice, it often ends up pleasing no one... The non-profit foundation side is easily dragged down, while the commercialization side is inevitably criticized for being disconnected.

View OriginalReply0

Blockblind