2026-01-12 22:24:37

Speaking of privacy protection, there are indeed some people working seriously in the blockchain field. DUSK's approach is quite interesting—it doesn't simply hide in the corner of privacy but instead aims to find a balance between protecting sensitive data and meeting regulatory requirements.

From an application perspective, this project mainly targets a few areas. First is the compliant financial sector—traditional financial institutions have strict data protection requirements, and DUSK's confidential smart contract technology allows sensitive transactions to be conducted on-chain without revealing all details transparently on the blockchain. Second is the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA), which is indeed a trend, but the challenge lies in balancing privacy and compliance considerations.

Interestingly, projects like this often face a dilemma: either sacrifice transparency to gain privacy or give up privacy to comply with regulations. DUSK attempts to alleviate this contradiction through technical means by designing infrastructure to support applications that require privacy but do not want to violate regulations. In the current DeFi ecosystem, this approach is still worth observing.

DUSK9,21%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCryer

· 01-15 01:03

Can privacy and regulation be both achieved? It sounds great, but how exactly can it be implemented in practice... --- RWA tokenization indeed faces bottlenecks; traditional finance folks are too cautious. --- Ultimately, it depends on how DUSK commercializes this technology. Anyone can write theoretical plans on paper. --- Those projects that previously claimed to prioritize privacy didn't really go anywhere. Can they finally break the deadlock this time? --- Confidential smart contracts sound impressive, but what about gas fees and performance? Will they become another performance nightmare? --- It always feels like this middle-ground approach is the easiest to be unsatisfactory to both sides... neither side is happy. --- Regulatory compliance in finance is indeed a blank space. If DUSK can really penetrate this area, it could be significant. --- The RWA opportunity window might only be a few years; rapid progress is necessary.

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 01-14 18:19

Haha, the balanced faction, this is the way smart people play. Can privacy and compliance coexist? I really want to see how DUSK plays. --- The RWA part is indeed a trap; choosing between privacy and compliance is painful for everyone. --- It's called a balance in a nice way, but in a harsh way, it's about pleasing neither side. Betting on DUSK's technical robustness. --- Can the confidentiality agreement really pass the regulatory authorities? It's a bit uncertain. --- Finally, there's a project daring to face this contradiction head-on, much better than those playing hide and seek.

View OriginalReply0

defi_detective

· 01-14 16:20

Privacy and regulation can be compatible, this direction is indeed rare. But can it really be achieved? --- RWA tokenization + privacy protection feels like skirting around regulatory boundaries. --- Playing the balancing act nicely, but ultimately on-chain data will still be exposed. --- Will compliant financial institutions really use this set? That's overthinking it a bit. --- From a technical perspective, it's good, but I'm worried it will end up as a useless product. --- Regulation and privacy are fundamentally opposed; DUSK's attempt to reconcile them is a bit naive. --- This idea is interesting, but how long it can survive is uncertain. --- Another project trying to "have it both ways," betting it won't die in the middle. --- Confidential smart contracts are indeed new, but will adoption increase? That's the real issue. --- Feels like making excuses for compliant financing parties; don't be fooled by the marketing copy.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropworkerZhang

· 01-13 16:39

Privacy and compliance are really hard to balance, but the idea behind DUSK is a bit different... However, to be honest, there are only a few projects that can achieve this.

View OriginalReply0

P2ENotWorking

· 01-12 22:54

Can privacy and compliance be achieved simultaneously? It sounds ideal, but the key is whether the technology can truly be implemented.

View OriginalReply0

Whale_Whisperer

· 01-12 22:53

Can privacy and regulation be balanced? It sounds ideal, but in reality, it's often a political game. I feel like DUSK wants to get involved in the RWA sector, but do those traditional finance folks really trust on-chain "confidentiality"? It's the same old rhetoric... in the end, it's still being suppressed by regulators. This idea is fresh, but the gamble is on when regulatory policies across countries will unify. Right now, it's all guesswork. Confidentiality agreements sound good, but the key is whether real money will actually flow in.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainFries

· 01-12 22:38

Can privacy and regulation be satisfied at the same time? It sounds great but is difficult. However, DUSK's approach is quite practical and doesn't take an extreme route.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractRebel

· 01-12 22:30

This is the right way to play with privacy, not the all-or-nothing approach.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOrektGuy

· 01-12 22:27

Privacy and regulation are really a trade-off. Can DUSK's approach of a middle ground work... Will it turn out to be just another marketing stunt? Let's wait and see. RWA tokenization is indeed stuck on privacy issues, but it still seems hard to escape the centralized review process. Will traditional institutions truly accept compliant blockchain finance? I'm a bit skeptical. The technical solutions sound good, but if regulations change suddenly, everything could be ruined. The risks are quite high. The concept of confidential smart contracts has been hyped for so long. Can DUSK come up with something new? Not very optimistic. A dilemma forcing a middle ground might end up pleasing neither side... DeFi is still playing with privacy, but the real world has long since compromised.

View OriginalReply0

RooftopVIP

· 01-12 22:26

Can privacy and regulation be balanced? That sounds too ideal. In reality, which regulatory agency would truly feel at ease?

View OriginalReply0