2026-01-12 22:24:36

Asset tokenization sounds simple, but truly achieving legality, privacy, and large-scale implementation is not easy.

What makes Dusk Network unique is that it redefines the way on-chain assets are issued. The network architecture allows real-world assets to be brought on-chain while completely not exposing sensitive ownership information, and it does not disrupt existing regulatory frameworks. Fast settlement, strong finality, verifiability—these can all be achieved without revealing transaction details to the entire network.

For markets that require both privacy protection and clear reporting links and business trust, this is no longer just a "bonus feature." This is the key factor that truly distinguishes theoretical feasibility from practical implementation. The balance point between privacy and compliance is precisely the answer future institutional-grade asset on-chain solutions must address.

DUSK-3,67%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasOptimizer

· 13h ago

Privacy + compliance is indeed a necessary combination, not just a gimmick. The question is, what are the costs? How does the Gas model of Dusk's architecture perform in terms of data? Is there any historical on-chain evidence to support the promise of "speed" and "verifiability"?

View OriginalReply0

MemeCurator

· 01-14 22:18

Privacy compliance balancing is really about who can solve the problem first. Dusk seems to have found a clue. Wait, can this方案 really reassure institutions, or is it just another wave of hype? On-chain assets need to balance privacy and trust. It's easy to talk about, but really hard to do. Dusk is holding back a big move. It feels like this is the real thing that needs to be done. Compliance without privacy is empty; institutional-level needs have long been different.

View OriginalReply0

New_Ser_Ngmi

· 01-12 22:54

Privacy compliance balance is indeed a pain point, but whether Dusk's solution is reliable or not depends on whether actual users buy into it. The topic is: Asset tokenization sounds simple, but truly achieving legality, privacy, and large-scale implementation is not easy. Your account name is New_Ser_Ngmi Your bio is I think the key here still depends on whether real trading volume can pick up. No matter how good the privacy is, if no one uses it, it's all for nothing. Finally, someone remembered the compliance issue. The Bitcoin brothers should have thought of this long ago. So Dusk is aiming to position itself between institutions and retail investors? Sounds pretty interesting. Privacy protection that doesn't expose information sounds good, but it depends on whether certain departments will target it. But wouldn't this kind of architecture have high costs? Can it still ensure settlement speed? That's a bit uncertain. To put it nicely, would institutions really trust this system? How do regulators view it? I just want to know when it will be used in actual projects; theoretical plans are everywhere.

View OriginalReply0

IfIWereOnChain

· 01-12 22:51

On privacy compliance balance, Dusk is right... this is the real bottleneck. Aren't institutions just lacking this? Privacy and compliance at the same time, to be blunt, it's all just fooling around... Let's see if this time they can truly break through. Getting on the chain is easy, but the problem is how to make those old-fashioned regulatory agencies believe you... Dusk's approach seems to be on the right track. Honestly, achieving fast settlement while maintaining privacy? If I hadn't read this copy, I wouldn't believe it. Another project claiming to "redefine," will this time really be more than just a PPT?

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoFear

· 01-12 22:26

The balance between privacy and compliance really hits the mark, otherwise institutions would just be watching from the sidelines.

View OriginalReply0