Regulatory shift alert: The EPA has changed its approach to air pollution rulemaking. Going forward, the agency will focus primarily on compliance costs for businesses rather than quantifying public health benefits from pollution reduction. This marks a significant departure from the agency's original mandate. The move means future environmental standards may prioritize economic factors over health impact assessments. For industries navigating regulatory landscapes, this signals evolving compliance frameworks worth monitoring. The policy adjustment could influence how operational and sustainability costs are evaluated across different sectors.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenRationEater
· 6h ago
Here we go again? Economy first, human lives second, truly unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 01-12 22:54
Economic priority, environmental protection is secondary? This shift is a bit outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-ccc36bc5
· 01-12 22:51
Well, this sounds like it's just about giving big corporations a green light...
Really, health benefits are no longer important? That's a brilliant logic.
Compliance costs take priority? Basically, money talks.
Another wave of economic interests crushing environmental protection, isn't it?
Now, pollution companies are having an even easier time.
Regulatory agencies have changed their tune, how much利益才能扭转啊。
EPA has shifted its stance, anyway, the public's lungs won't complain...
So now, corporate costs > people's health? How is this calculated?
Another policy reversal, it seems environmental issues are really being pushed to the back burner.
No wonder it's driven by capital; how much is health worth?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollector
· 01-12 22:38
The key is not about being cheaper, but about who foots the bill...
Regulatory shift alert: The EPA has changed its approach to air pollution rulemaking. Going forward, the agency will focus primarily on compliance costs for businesses rather than quantifying public health benefits from pollution reduction. This marks a significant departure from the agency's original mandate. The move means future environmental standards may prioritize economic factors over health impact assessments. For industries navigating regulatory landscapes, this signals evolving compliance frameworks worth monitoring. The policy adjustment could influence how operational and sustainability costs are evaluated across different sectors.