2026-01-12 22:23:36

The blockchain industry has been swinging between privacy protection and regulatory compliance. Dusk Network's approach is quite interesting—they didn't choose an extreme fully anonymous route, but instead leveraged zero-knowledge proof technology to protect transaction details while allowing data to pass regulatory scrutiny.

This is especially critical for financial markets. As regulatory authorities around the world gradually step in, for the crypto industry to truly enter mainstream finance, it must find a balance between privacy and transparency. Dusk's idea is to carve out a path within this contradiction—protect user privacy while meeting regulatory requirements.

From a technical architecture perspective, this design enables the coexistence of DeFi and compliant applications. For scenarios that require both data privacy protection and adherence to financial regulations, such infrastructure-based projects are indeed worth long-term attention. They represent an important direction for the crypto industry to mature.

DUSK8,9%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StablecoinArbitrageur

· 01-15 21:22

actually, the real arbitrage here isn't zk-proofs vs transparency... it's the basis points regulators leave on the table when they don't understand liquidity fragmentation. dusk's doing interesting work but let's be honest, compliance always comes with friction costs. been backtesting the slippage implications (n=5000) and the numbers don't lie.

Reply0

LadderToolGuy

· 01-12 22:43

The zero-knowledge proof approach has long been overdue for widespread adoption, and Dusk's approach has indeed taken the right direction.

View OriginalReply0

MemeKingNFT

· 01-12 22:41

It's really not about being particular, Dusk's move is indeed a bit something... The set of zero-knowledge proofs definitely opened a gap in the dilemma of "wanting both." There's a sense of the rise and fall of the mainland, and a bright future after darkness. I sensed this direction as early as last year. The contradiction between privacy and regulation is fundamentally irreconcilable? Wrong, this is the question that blue-chip projects should be thinking about. Those who are still playing with fully anonymous coins, looking back now... hmm, maybe we should wait. As for compliance, rather than stubbornly fighting it, it's better to go with the flow. This is where on-chain data truly becomes valuable.

View OriginalReply0

DataBartender

· 01-12 22:35

Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed quite interesting, but I wonder if they can truly fool regulatory authorities... Dusk's approach looks promising, but the key is whether the execution can hold up; it seems to depend on how it is implemented later on. Privacy and compliance are always at odds; finding a balance this time would be considered a success.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightMEVeater

· 01-12 22:35

Good morning, 3 a.m... Zero-knowledge proof is like the "transparent soup" fed to regulators, but what's really in the soup? Heh.

View OriginalReply0

BagHolderTillRetire

· 01-12 22:29

Zero-knowledge proofs are truly impressive; they can hide and prove at the same time, and regulators can't find any fault with them.

View OriginalReply0