To put it simply, it's just a capital allocation decision. The problem is—too many projects in the crypto space treat buybacks as a lifeline, using them to cover up the fact that there is no real product-market fit.
This is completely different from traditional stock buybacks. Stock repurchases usually occur when a company is already mature, with stable operations and ample cash flow. But crypto projects? Many haven't even figured out their core value, yet they start spending money on token buybacks in an attempt to boost the price.
Here's the difference: buybacks in traditional companies are the icing on the cake, while in the crypto world, buybacks often serve as a cover-up—masking weak user growth, insufficient active engagement, and a lack of genuine demand. In the long run, buybacks without solid product support are ultimately just a way to quench thirst with poison.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotSatoshi
· 12h ago
Ultimately, it's just self-deception; if there were really good products, who would still use this approach?
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardian
· 18h ago
That's so true, buybacks are just a cover-up, really.
View OriginalReply0
screenshot_gains
· 01-15 04:54
Basically, it's just hype. Projects with real products don't need to recite buyback spells every day.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalDetective
· 01-12 22:53
Honestly, these projects' buybacks are just paper tigers. If there's no product, don't bother messing around.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiac
· 01-12 22:49
Buybacks are essentially a fool's game; projects without product strength use them as a cover-up. How many such cases have you seen? In the end, it's just a mess.
View OriginalReply0
LayoffMiner
· 01-12 22:44
You're absolutely right; it's just robbing Peter to pay Paul. Eventually, it will all come crashing down.
View OriginalReply0
NewPumpamentals
· 01-12 22:37
That's so true. Otherwise, how can we explain projects that buy back every day but still go to zero after a month?
Token buybacks have never been a business model.
To put it simply, it's just a capital allocation decision. The problem is—too many projects in the crypto space treat buybacks as a lifeline, using them to cover up the fact that there is no real product-market fit.
This is completely different from traditional stock buybacks. Stock repurchases usually occur when a company is already mature, with stable operations and ample cash flow. But crypto projects? Many haven't even figured out their core value, yet they start spending money on token buybacks in an attempt to boost the price.
Here's the difference: buybacks in traditional companies are the icing on the cake, while in the crypto world, buybacks often serve as a cover-up—masking weak user growth, insufficient active engagement, and a lack of genuine demand. In the long run, buybacks without solid product support are ultimately just a way to quench thirst with poison.