In traditional finance, retail investors can only passively accept the rules. But in some emerging DeFi ecosystems, the situation is starting to change.



Take projects like Walrus as an example. Its core logic is straightforward: tokens are not just trading assets but also serve as a credential for your influence within the ecosystem. The more you hold and the more actively you participate, the greater your weight in voting and decision-making. This sounds simple, but implementing it requires sophisticated mechanism design.

The project team sets differentiated weights and incentives for participants at different levels. Those who contribute more gain more voting power, which motivates every member to get involved. Over time, an interesting phenomenon emerges: everyone is working to improve the project because each person's benefits are directly linked to the ecosystem's development. Once this self-motivating cycle is formed, it becomes very hard to break.

Therefore, the value of tokens is not only derived from trading and liquidity mining but also from the actual participation of community members. What should a true DeFi experience look like? Not just lying back and waiting for returns, but actively participating in rule-making and ecosystem building, making every choice meaningful. For those who want to pursue more than just numerical growth in the crypto market and seek real influence, these projects offer a relatively transparent and mechanismally secure testing ground.
WAL-6,07%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
governance_ghostvip
· 01-14 15:09
Sounds quite ideal, but how many actually get implemented?
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprivedvip
· 01-12 22:51
Well, speaking of which, this set of logic sounds pretty good, but how many actually get implemented...
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddictvip
· 01-12 22:34
Speaking of this model, it sounds good, but how many projects can truly execute it effectively? Most are just fake democracy.
View OriginalReply0
metaverse_hermitvip
· 01-12 22:32
It sounds ideal, but can voting power really be distributed equally? Will early investors still dominate newcomers?
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOnvip
· 01-12 22:24
Sounds good, but can it really be implemented? --- The voting rights token sounds great, but I'm worried it might just be empty promises again --- I'm a bit skeptical about this incentive mechanism. Will it end up being exploited by big players? --- Finally, a project wants to change the game rules. Looking forward to Walrus actually delivering --- Tokens have voting rights? Then us small retail investors still don't stand a chance --- The idea of a self-incentive cycle is too idealistic. In reality, such things rarely happen --- Interesting, but only if the project team is truly willing to relinquish power --- DeFi is about enabling participation in decision-making. That's why we got involved --- But it also depends on how the voting mechanism is designed; it could be easily manipulated --- Feels just like the promises made by previous DAO projects. What happened to them later?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)