The core competitiveness of DUSK can be summarized in two words: dual drive. One is gas payments, covering all network operations—privacy transaction encapsulation, RWA tokenization—all rely on it; the second is staking, which provides network security through the Succinct Attestation consensus mechanism while distributing rewards. The APY depends on the emission and fee-sharing ratio.
Once the L2 rollout is implemented next year, DUSK's gas demand will increase exponentially. EVM compatibility allows developers to integrate with zero difficulty, the mainnet settlement guarantees finality, and all cross-layer interactions require gas fees. The supporting Zedger protocol upgrade has already integrated Hyperstaking, enabling stakers to customize privacy reward pools, boosting both token liquidity and utility.
There is also a clever design—NPEX MiCA CEX, with DUSK as the central token, allocates part of the trading fees back to the staking reward pool, creating a positive feedback loop. From a tokenomics perspective, the total supply cap is 1 billion, with a high circulation rate, a 36-year decreasing emission cycle to ensure long-term scarcity; combined with the gas burning mechanism, a deflationary effect naturally emerges.
With the RWA boom accelerating, institutional-grade assets on-chain require zero-knowledge privacy protection. DUSK's gas and staking demands will surge simultaneously. Chainlink integration optimizes data flow, enabling frictionless cross-chain RWA interactions. DUSK, acting as a bridge token, has broad prospects. Honestly, 2026 will be a pivotal year for DUSK, transforming from infrastructure to mainstream compliant DeFi, and its value potential is indeed worth paying attention to.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OffchainOracle
· 01-14 15:05
The dual-drive design is indeed excellent. The combination of gas + staking packs quite a punch, but I'm worried that when L2 launches next year, it might be repeatedly overshadowed by other privacy solutions. Whether RWA can truly benefit from the dividends will depend on the speed of implementation.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSweaterFan
· 01-14 04:39
Gas burning + staking positive feedback, this set of tokenomics really has some substance, but we need to wait until L2 is fully deployed to verify it.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedTwice
· 01-12 22:57
The dual-drive logic is indeed solid, but I'm worried that after L2 implementation, the gas demand might surge and outpace the capacity, leading to network congestion again.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaskVictim
· 01-12 22:51
Dual-drive mode sounds good, but I'm worried it might turn out to be another "perfect design" that ends in a disappointing finish.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-12 22:49
The dual-drive mode really has some substance—gas burning combined with staking dividends. I'm just worried that after the L2 launches next year, the demand for gas might not be as strong.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketman
· 01-12 22:49
Next year's L2 launch window opens, and this wave of gas fuel injection is expected to increase exponentially. The DUSK orbital design is indeed meticulous... Just the combination of gas + staking is enough to support the upward trend.
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHunter
· 01-12 22:44
The dual-drive model is indeed interesting—combining gas fees with staking. If L2 expands next year, this approach is expected to become popular.
View OriginalReply0
HashBandit
· 01-12 22:39
ngl the gas burn mechanism hitting different when L2s actually scale... back in my mining days we'd kill for this kind of fee structure, but then again i've been burned before so 🤷
Reply0
BrokenYield
· 01-12 22:30
double-tap utility doesn't guarantee adoption when smart money always exits first... seen this tokenomics play before
The core competitiveness of DUSK can be summarized in two words: dual drive. One is gas payments, covering all network operations—privacy transaction encapsulation, RWA tokenization—all rely on it; the second is staking, which provides network security through the Succinct Attestation consensus mechanism while distributing rewards. The APY depends on the emission and fee-sharing ratio.
Once the L2 rollout is implemented next year, DUSK's gas demand will increase exponentially. EVM compatibility allows developers to integrate with zero difficulty, the mainnet settlement guarantees finality, and all cross-layer interactions require gas fees. The supporting Zedger protocol upgrade has already integrated Hyperstaking, enabling stakers to customize privacy reward pools, boosting both token liquidity and utility.
There is also a clever design—NPEX MiCA CEX, with DUSK as the central token, allocates part of the trading fees back to the staking reward pool, creating a positive feedback loop. From a tokenomics perspective, the total supply cap is 1 billion, with a high circulation rate, a 36-year decreasing emission cycle to ensure long-term scarcity; combined with the gas burning mechanism, a deflationary effect naturally emerges.
With the RWA boom accelerating, institutional-grade assets on-chain require zero-knowledge privacy protection. DUSK's gas and staking demands will surge simultaneously. Chainlink integration optimizes data flow, enabling frictionless cross-chain RWA interactions. DUSK, acting as a bridge token, has broad prospects. Honestly, 2026 will be a pivotal year for DUSK, transforming from infrastructure to mainstream compliant DeFi, and its value potential is indeed worth paying attention to.