Still sticking to the previous view—$LIT has a chance to fall back below $2. By the way, with so many DEXs engaging in liquidity mining, why should it continue to rise? The project itself is indeed good, and large airdrops are attractive, but the problem is the lack of token utility. Without real use cases to support it, how long can the price increase last? Time will tell.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHuntress
· 01-15 21:39
After research and analysis, the tokenomics design of $LIT indeed has issues, and the inflation pressure from liquidity mining is not to be underestimated.
---
Another capital pump, large airdrops just attract retail investors to take the bait, but what about practical application scenarios?
---
There is a chance below $2, but don't be greedy; the risks are right there.
---
This round of correction can expose the true intentions of the project team. It's worth considering but requires caution.
---
With liquidity mining everywhere on DEXs, why must LIT rise? The logic doesn't add up.
---
Pay attention to the movements of these wallet addresses; data shows that big players are quietly reducing their holdings.
---
The project's background is questionable; historical data indicates that such airdrop projects are hard to sustain popularity.
---
Without practical applications to support, even the most impressive data are just illusions.
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamer
· 01-12 23:28
I think what you said makes some sense, but the strength of the LIT airdrop this time is indeed impressive.
---
Below $2? I think it's uncertain; the current hype hasn't died down yet.
---
The lack of token functionality hits a sore spot; I'm just worried it might be a flash in the pan project.
---
Liquidity mining has been using this routine for a while; it was about time to get tired of it. Let's see who can come up with new tricks.
---
However, the large-scale airdrop still has appeal, and there should still be short-term speculative space.
---
To be honest, tokens without real-world applications will eventually hit the floor.
---
Let's wait and see; I'm already prepared for a 50% cut.
---
The problem isn't with LIT itself, but with the entire DEX market being too competitive.
---
Time will give the answer; let's just wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMO
· 01-12 22:50
Airdrops can attract attention temporarily, but ultimately it depends on whether the tokenomics can hold up.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 01-12 22:49
It's all clear now, $LIT is just a cash-out scheme. Has the airdrop bloodsucking finished?
What’s the point of talking about a token with no use? Going down is just a matter of time.
Those liquidity mining schemes are just pure money grabs.
I'm waiting to buy the dip below $2, or just give up altogether.
This round depends on who runs away first, haha.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiHeir
· 01-12 22:43
It should be pointed out that this brother's argument contains obvious fallacies. On-chain data shows that liquidity mining and price trends are not simply negatively correlated — this is a classic case of reverse causality. The real issue lies in the design flaws of the token economic model, not the mining itself.
Let me be frank: the dilemma of $LIT fundamentally stems from a lack of value consensus. Without use cases or genuine demand, even airdrops are just passing the buck. Time will indeed provide answers, but the answers have long been written in the on-chain data.
That's correct, but your perspective is still too shallow. The problem isn't whether the price goes up or down, but that this model itself is a dead end.
In this market cycle, any token without actual functional support will eventually return to reality. $LIT is no exception. It's better to wait and see.
Undoubtedly, liquidity mining has become a variant of passing the buck. Project teams come up with one scheme after another, retail investors take the last baton — nothing new.
Still sticking to the previous view—$LIT has a chance to fall back below $2. By the way, with so many DEXs engaging in liquidity mining, why should it continue to rise? The project itself is indeed good, and large airdrops are attractive, but the problem is the lack of token utility. Without real use cases to support it, how long can the price increase last? Time will tell.