A feedback loop that actually works—imagine letting users rate campaigns the way they'd review anything else. Stars, quick thoughts, the whole deal. What clicked, what flopped, what could've been better. Both sides win here: projects get candid insights to level up their game, and the platform itself gets a built-in quality meter. It's the kind of transparency that weeds out the noise and helps decent projects stand out. Real feedback tends to separate the wheat from the chaff pretty quick.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
VitalikFanboy42
· 16h ago
Wow, if this feedback mechanism really works, those trash projects will be exposed immediately.
View OriginalReply0
MondayYoloFridayCry
· 23h ago
This feedback system sounds good, but how many projects are actually usable? Most of them are probably just for show, right?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 01-12 22:04
Another "User Rating System" genius plan, sounds really good, but I wonder if the project team will actually listen to feedback or just continue to cut leeks haha
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalist
· 01-12 22:03
ngl, this feedback mechanism sounds good, but I'm worried it will end up being just a game of mutual praise again.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 01-12 22:02
To be honest, this rating system sounds good in theory but mostly collapses in execution. Trash projects can still rack up high scores.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTrader
· 01-12 21:42
The genuine feedback system is good, just worried it might end up as a shouting match at the end.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_resilient
· 01-12 21:39
NGL, this scoring system should have been implemented long ago. I'm just worried that truly garbage projects will still find ways to raise funds.
A feedback loop that actually works—imagine letting users rate campaigns the way they'd review anything else. Stars, quick thoughts, the whole deal. What clicked, what flopped, what could've been better. Both sides win here: projects get candid insights to level up their game, and the platform itself gets a built-in quality meter. It's the kind of transparency that weeds out the noise and helps decent projects stand out. Real feedback tends to separate the wheat from the chaff pretty quick.