Ever notice how some projects tackle inflation head-on? Take the deflationary mechanism approach—basically, every transaction triggers a burn of transaction fees, both base and priority tiers. Sounds simple, but here's where it gets interesting: the supply actively shrinks.
Why does this matter? As the network scales and transaction volume picks up, those burns compound. You're looking at a system that actively counters built-in inflation (say, 7% annually) through usage itself. More adoption = more transactions = more burns = real scarcity pressure.
It's not just theoretical—the mechanics are baked right into the protocol. When supply contractions accelerate alongside growth, that's when you see the economic model start to shift in favor of token holders.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTragedy
· 01-15 20:44
The token burning mechanism sounds good, but it depends on whether it can truly attract enough trading volume in the future; otherwise, it's all just talk.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 01-13 12:42
The burn mechanism sounds good, but I'm worried that the actual user base might not keep up.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 01-12 22:01
Damn, this destruction mechanism is really awesome. I'm just worried the project team might change the rules again later.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMom
· 01-12 21:59
The method of burning coins is indeed brilliant. The more you use, the scarcer the coins become. This is the true deflationary logic.
View OriginalReply0
DeFi_Dad_Jokes
· 01-12 21:56
ngl, this deflationary mechanism sounds good, but very few projects can truly stick to burning tokens; most end up being PPT economies in the end.
View OriginalReply0
PumpingCroissant
· 01-12 21:33
Forget it, this kind of deflationary mechanism sounds great, but there are very few who can actually implement it effectively.
Ever notice how some projects tackle inflation head-on? Take the deflationary mechanism approach—basically, every transaction triggers a burn of transaction fees, both base and priority tiers. Sounds simple, but here's where it gets interesting: the supply actively shrinks.
Why does this matter? As the network scales and transaction volume picks up, those burns compound. You're looking at a system that actively counters built-in inflation (say, 7% annually) through usage itself. More adoption = more transactions = more burns = real scarcity pressure.
It's not just theoretical—the mechanics are baked right into the protocol. When supply contractions accelerate alongside growth, that's when you see the economic model start to shift in favor of token holders.