2026-01-12 21:24:15

Looking at the latest developments, it was previously said that the board had approved a large-scale increase in ETH holdings, but now they are saying that if shareholders do not approve the authorization to issue new shares, the pace of accumulation will have to slow down. The frequency of these face-slapping moments is quite rapid.

Thinking carefully, based on the company's stock price trend and actual operational situation, there is really no issue of stubbornness or persistence, nor is there any real trouble. Why would they make such statements? This logic indeed doesn't hold up.

To be honest, I can't quite predict what will happen next; it still depends on the facts. But based on the current pattern, I think this is probably a no-go. And considering this brother's level of understanding, he's really just digging a hole for a bunch of blindly following retail investors. In the end, those who lose money are the ones who go all-in without thinking it through.

ETH-0,5%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCryer

· 01-15 19:59

The board approves, and shareholders authorize, switching back and forth? I've seen this trick too many times, it's really hard to keep a straight face. People who go all-in blindly end up crying, there's a reason for that. What happened to the promised large-scale increase? Why the change of tune? It's okay to facepalm, but not too often. This logic is full of loopholes, even a layman can see through it. Instead of listening to stories, it's better to look at on-chain data—that's real gold and silver. Such obvious tricks and still follow the trend? Serves you right for getting cut. I really want to see what they can come up with next.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-beba108d

· 01-14 21:39

Just keep jumping back and forth, I'm tired of this routine Saying they'll increase holdings and actually increasing, but still have to look at the shareholders' faces But on the other hand, this wave really feels like fishing Retail investors following the trend are going to suffer; just wait for the bottom-fishers to take over This logical flaw is everywhere, something feels off The board approved it but didn't actually approve it, is this playing word games? Sigh, in the end, it's still that saying: whoever takes the final baton will cry

View OriginalReply0

DYORMaster

· 01-12 21:54

Preaching is not impossible; I've seen this routine too many times. Repeated corporate decisions that result in face-slapping indicate either last-minute efforts or empty promises.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotLaborer

· 01-12 21:54

Here we go again with this trick. You said you'd increase your holdings, but it immediately shrank. This tactic is getting more and more skillful.

View OriginalReply0

GasWhisperer

· 01-12 21:53

lmao the flip-flopping on eth accumulation is sending me... board approved then suddenly "well actually shareholders gotta vote first" 🤡 classic bait and switch energy

Reply0

BackrowObserver

· 01-12 21:43

Changing your tune again? I've seen this trick too many times. The big moves promised end up shrinking in the blink of an eye. One moment it's the board of directors, the next it's shareholders, which really confuses retail investors. Anyway, I don't believe it anymore. Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0