The allocation structure of this project is thoughtfully designed. Community rewards account for 30%, gradually released over about 10 years—this is clearly aimed at locking in long-term participants. Core contributors and investors are also subject to a 4-year lock-up period, with an additional 1-year cliff. This design logic actually reflects the team's consideration for ecosystem stability. Tokens won't be dumped immediately, and participant interests are closely tied.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZKProofEnthusiast
· 23h ago
4 years of locking + 1 year cliff, this tactic is really ruthless, directly killing the idea of dumping.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMaker
· 01-15 12:42
4-year lock-up period? Now that's genuine commitment, unlike some projects that go offline right after launch.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 01-14 22:32
Well, a 4-year lock-up period sounds intimidating, but it's really a long-term gamble. The problem is, what about those who can't wait? They've already left.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFoodie
· 01-12 21:11
ngl this tokenomics structure is basically the farm-to-fork verification of crypto projects — you actually know where every token comes from and where it's going. that 4-year cliff? *chef's kiss* it's like aging a fine wine, not rushing it to market half-baked. the real question tho is whether this team can actually maintain "proof-of-freshness" for a decade without everything going stale
Reply0
GasFeeSobber
· 01-12 21:10
10-year linear release... I've seen this trick too many times, and in the end, it's just a scam.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBot
· 01-12 21:10
Gradually releasing over 10 years? I've seen this approach many times, but in the end, it all comes down to execution.
View OriginalReply0
DeepRabbitHole
· 01-12 21:10
Lock-up for 4 years, cliff of 1 year... Basically, it's just to prevent a run, but this way it can indeed stabilize the market.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 01-12 21:06
Oops, this tokenomics design is indeed good; long-term locking is still necessary.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDoomsDay
· 01-12 20:50
Uh... 4 years of locking + 1 year cliff, this kind of play is really ruthless. But I have to say, this definitely can trap those impatient folks trying to dump the market.
View OriginalReply0
FastLeaver
· 01-12 20:42
Haha, this locking logic is really clever. The 30% community rewards are gradually released over 10 years, truly just to prevent big investors from dumping everything at once.
The allocation structure of this project is thoughtfully designed. Community rewards account for 30%, gradually released over about 10 years—this is clearly aimed at locking in long-term participants. Core contributors and investors are also subject to a 4-year lock-up period, with an additional 1-year cliff. This design logic actually reflects the team's consideration for ecosystem stability. Tokens won't be dumped immediately, and participant interests are closely tied.