Dusk recently announced a multi-layer architecture evolution plan, which is not only a technical optimization but also a systematic solution to the core pain points faced by traditional financial institutions entering the blockchain ecosystem.



Conventional blockchain architectures often adopt monolithic designs, consolidating consensus mechanisms, data availability, and smart contract execution on a single chain. This design results in high costs, long iteration cycles, and significant shortcomings in stability and tooling completeness for financial institutions with strict compliance requirements. Dusk's approach is different—it decomposes the entire system into three independently operating modules, each optimized for specific scenarios.

The bottom layer is DuskDS, which provides the fundamental network functions: consensus algorithm, data availability verification, and final settlement. It can be understood as the ledger administrator of the entire system, safeguarding the legality and security of all state transitions. More importantly, this layer integrates native cross-layer bridging mechanisms, allowing asset transfers between layers without third-party custody, thus avoiding the risks associated with traditional cross-chain solutions.

The middle layer is DuskEVM, which offers far more than a simple new virtual machine. Its EVM compatibility means Solidity developers can seamlessly access existing toolchains—such as Hardhat, MetaMask, and a complete ecosystem that is ready to use out of the box. In other words, DeFi applications and compliant financial products that previously required months of rewriting and adaptation can now be migrated almost as-is. Interestingly, this layer plans to incorporate homomorphic encryption capabilities, enabling on-chain transactions to meet auditing requirements while protecting sensitive business information, making it especially suitable for financial scenarios.

The top layer is DuskVM privacy application module, running fully private applications based on the Phoenix protocol and Piecrust virtual machine. For financial logic with high data sensitivity, this provides a secure and flexible environment for privacy operations.

The beauty of this multi-layer separation of concerns lies in clear responsibilities— the bottom layer ensures high security and finality of settlement, the middle layer supports existing ecosystems and general application needs, and the top layer offers dedicated space for privacy protection.
DUSK5,72%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MysteryBoxAddictvip
· 19h ago
Three-tier architecture sounds good, but I'm concerned whether it will just be another set of "paper skills"... Can it really make traditional financial institutions feel comfortable using it? --- Homomorphic encryption is a highlight, with auditability and privacy—truly hitting the pain points of finance. --- I've seen too many EVM-compatible solutions; the key question is whether DuskDS can really handle cross-chain risks, or if we'll still have to rely on third parties. --- Multi-layer segmentation sounds like a clear architecture, but interoperability among multi-chain systems is always the devil... --- The strategy for financial institutions is quite clear, but privacy protection still poses compliance risks for traditional banks. --- The privacy application layer of DuskVM feels the most imaginative—finally, a project that’s not just about speed. --- It sounds good, but what's wrong with a monolithic chain? Why do we need to divide it into so many layers? --- Transferring DeFi applications as-is? I want to see if it’s really as-is, or if there will be more modifications. --- If the underlying native bridging mechanism can truly work, this scheme still has competitive strength.
View OriginalReply0
HallucinationGrowervip
· 19h ago
The three-layer architecture sounds good, but there are very few projects that can truly be implemented. Traditional finance folks are just afraid of trouble. EVM compatibility is somewhat clever, saving them from having to learn it all over again. That homomorphic encryption capability is hyped up quite a bit, but in practice, will it turn out to be the same old story... Cross-chain risks are indeed a big problem. If native bridging is done securely, there is real potential in this area. But right now, all talk is useless. It all depends on whether Dusk can attract the first batch of financial institutions to actually use it.
View OriginalReply0
HashBrowniesvip
· 19h ago
Alright, a three-layer architecture sounds good, but actual implementation is the real key. I need to see how homomorphic encryption performs in practice; don’t let it be just theoretical advantages. It seems that compliance is still the main concern for financial institutions. Has this really been solved this time? No matter how beautiful the architecture is, if the review department blocks you, it’s still a no-go. I want to see actual cross-layer bridging cases; just talking about risk avoidance is too vague. EVM compatibility is a plus, but will the ecosystem migration really be that low-cost? How to balance privacy and auditing—this is a real issue. It feels like Dusk is serious about their work, but we’ll have to wait until the mainnet launches. DuskDS’s settlement mechanism sounds a bit like the Cosmos ecosystem approach? This solution indeed addresses the pain points of traditional finance and is much clearer than single-chain solutions.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisfitvip
· 19h ago
I have to say, the layered architecture approach does have some merit, but whether it can truly attract traditional finance to enter depends on implementation... Speaking of which, the EVM compatibility is quite well done, saving developers from having to learn new things. However, can homomorphic encryption really run stably? This three-layer design looks elegant at first glance, but it still depends on whether Dusk can truly build out the ecosystem. Otherwise, even the best architecture is useless. Most importantly, security must not fail. In finance, the risks are too high, and any problem in any link can be a major issue.
View OriginalReply0
ChainPoetvip
· 19h ago
The three-layer architecture sounds good, but whether it can truly attract traditional finance to enter... still depends on whether the privacy layer can effectively protect sensitive data.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntressvip
· 19h ago
After research and analysis, the Dusk architecture design is indeed interesting, but the key is to understand the tokenomics and the background of the capital side before taking action.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt