What is the biggest concern when playing with new protocols in DeFi? I think most people's first reaction is still security issues. And Lista DAO's performance in this area indeed provides much reassurance.

Unlike some projects that focus solely on promoting high yields to attract attention, Lista invests effort in the security and stability of the protocol itself. Look at its smart contracts, which have undergone rigorous audits by well-known industry audit firms—this is the most basic guarantee.

Its collateralized lending model is also interesting—the logic of over-collateralization acts like a shock absorber for the entire system. No matter how volatile the market, this buffer can hold.

On the asset side, mainstream blue-chip assets like BTCB and ETH are used as collateral, which are highly liquid and have deep consensus, making systemic risk significantly lower. This is not just a feeling but a real improvement in asset quality.

I really appreciate the cautious attitude of the project team—this is about doing long-term business, not chasing short-term hype. Projects worthy of asset trust should operate this way.

At the strategy level, Lista also collaborates with professional institutions in the security research field to continuously monitor and iterate on the protocol's status, preventing issues before they happen. Such forward-looking defense is rarely seen.

There's also an interesting phenomenon—community discussions about security are very active. Users exchange risk awareness and share knowledge, and this collective vigilance itself forms another layer of protection beyond technology.

Stablecoin yield farming is a highly competitive track, but there are few projects that truly prioritize security over superficial data presentation or false appearances.