Arkham will remove support for multiple blockchains such as Linea and Manta within 2 days. This seemingly routine platform maintenance decision actually exposes a real issue in the L2 ecosystem: not all chains will survive. According to the latest news, the Arkham Intel platform will cease data tracking and analysis services for these chains starting January 11. This not only affects users’ on-chain data query experience but also reflects changes in the status of these L2 projects within the ecosystem.
Multiple Chains Removed Simultaneously, What Are Arkham’s Evaluation Criteria?
According to official statements, Arkham regularly assesses whether to continue maintaining chain integrations, primarily considering two factors:
Level of user demand (whether enough users are utilizing the chain’s data services)
The chain’s importance to the crypto ecosystem (its influence and position within the overall ecosystem)
This means Arkham’s removal decisions are not sudden but are based on data-driven rational judgments. Chains that are removed either have insufficient user base, diminished importance within the ecosystem, or both.
Which Chains Are Removed, What Is the Timeline?
Based on the latest information, at least three chains are on Arkham’s removal list:
Blockchain
Removal Date
Remarks
Linea
January 11
About to be removed
Manta
January 11
Removed simultaneously
Blast
Announced
Public notice on January 7
All three are recent L2 solutions that have gained market attention. Their appearance on the removal list indicates this is not an isolated issue but part of a broader trend.
What Does This Mean?
Impact on Removed Chains
Arkham is one of the most important on-chain data analysis platforms in the crypto space, with a large user base of traders, analysts, and institutions. Losing Arkham’s data support means:
Users will find it difficult to track large transfers and whale movements on these chains
Analysts lose a vital data source
Transparency and traceability of these chains decline
User enthusiasm and activity on these chains may further decrease
Implications for the L2 Ecosystem
This decision reflects a harsh reality: the segmentation within the L2 space is intensifying. Although many L2 solutions have been launched, only a few projects have achieved widespread adoption and a substantial user base. Arkham’s selective maintenance effectively acts as a market vote—user demand and ecosystem importance are key to survival.
Future Focus
Will other data analysis platforms (like Etherscan, Dune, etc.) follow suit with similar decisions?
Will the removed chains develop new initiatives to change their current situation?
How will L2 project teams respond to the loss of data services?
Does this indicate further integration within the L2 ecosystem?
Summary
Arkham’s removal of support for chains like Linea and Manta may seem like a platform maintenance decision, but it actually serves as an assessment of these L2 projects’ ecosystem status. Under the metrics of user demand and ecosystem importance, their performance has been less than ideal. The takeaway for the entire L2 track is: easy to launch, hard to survive. Only projects that truly gain user recognition and ecosystem support can stand firm in the competition. For investors, this is also a signal—focus on projects with real user bases and ecosystem vitality, rather than just funding and hype.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Arkham Cleanup: Multiple L2s including Linea Removed from Listings, What Signal Does This Send Back?
Arkham will remove support for multiple blockchains such as Linea and Manta within 2 days. This seemingly routine platform maintenance decision actually exposes a real issue in the L2 ecosystem: not all chains will survive. According to the latest news, the Arkham Intel platform will cease data tracking and analysis services for these chains starting January 11. This not only affects users’ on-chain data query experience but also reflects changes in the status of these L2 projects within the ecosystem.
Multiple Chains Removed Simultaneously, What Are Arkham’s Evaluation Criteria?
According to official statements, Arkham regularly assesses whether to continue maintaining chain integrations, primarily considering two factors:
This means Arkham’s removal decisions are not sudden but are based on data-driven rational judgments. Chains that are removed either have insufficient user base, diminished importance within the ecosystem, or both.
Which Chains Are Removed, What Is the Timeline?
Based on the latest information, at least three chains are on Arkham’s removal list:
All three are recent L2 solutions that have gained market attention. Their appearance on the removal list indicates this is not an isolated issue but part of a broader trend.
What Does This Mean?
Impact on Removed Chains
Arkham is one of the most important on-chain data analysis platforms in the crypto space, with a large user base of traders, analysts, and institutions. Losing Arkham’s data support means:
Implications for the L2 Ecosystem
This decision reflects a harsh reality: the segmentation within the L2 space is intensifying. Although many L2 solutions have been launched, only a few projects have achieved widespread adoption and a substantial user base. Arkham’s selective maintenance effectively acts as a market vote—user demand and ecosystem importance are key to survival.
Future Focus
Summary
Arkham’s removal of support for chains like Linea and Manta may seem like a platform maintenance decision, but it actually serves as an assessment of these L2 projects’ ecosystem status. Under the metrics of user demand and ecosystem importance, their performance has been less than ideal. The takeaway for the entire L2 track is: easy to launch, hard to survive. Only projects that truly gain user recognition and ecosystem support can stand firm in the competition. For investors, this is also a signal—focus on projects with real user bases and ecosystem vitality, rather than just funding and hype.