2026-01-09 07:01:51

#2026年比特币价格展望 JPMorgan analysts' latest statement: In January, the capital flow into cryptocurrency ETFs has stabilized. Interestingly, last month, global stock ETFs surged by a record high of $235 billion, but Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs are actually losing money—that is, traditional finance is疯狂买入, but crypto asset ETFs are bleeding.

However, analysts point out that based on ETF capital flows and perpetual futures positions, the market's selling pressure is gradually easing. The previous decline? Mainly caused by MSCI hinting in October that they might remove cryptocurrencies from their indices, triggering panic cash-outs, rather than a real liquidity problem.

The latest development—MSCI has confirmed that in the February 2026 global stock benchmark review, they will not remove Bitcoin and crypto-related financial companies. This decision should somewhat ease market concerns and help stabilize the market moving forward.

BTC-3,96%

ETH-6,96%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SmartContractRebel

· 01-10 02:21

Traditional finance is疯狂 buying stocks and ETFs, while we're bleeding here. The gap is huge. MSCI, stop doing that already. Can you calm down for a couple of days? Is the selling pressure just easing? Wake up, brother, this is just the beginning. Liquidity is no problem, what are you talking about? Who's dumping the market? Let's wait until February, anyway my coins are still here. Why be cowardly? Waiting for traditional finance to realize, by then it'll be too late to regret. This turnaround is a bit expensive. How much have you been trapped for to wait for this sentence?

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroJunkie

· 01-10 00:45

Traditional finance is疯狂吸血, while we are still bleeding, which is a bit ironic. MSCI's move this time can be considered a timely stop-loss; otherwise, panic selling would have driven the prices through the floor. Wait, is this another round of the "good news is all bad news" trick? Fund flow is the real indicator; don't be led by the news. To put it simply, big institutions are accumulating, while retail investors are still hesitant—that's the difference.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoChain

· 01-09 07:31

Traditional finance is pouring in 235 billion USD, while our BTC and ETH are bleeding. The gap is really heartbreaking. MSCI, please don't kick us out, at least give us a way to survive.

View OriginalReply0

VitaliksTwin

· 01-09 07:31

Haha, traditional finance is bottom-fishing, while we're cutting losses. This has become almost routine. MSCI has clarified this round, but I think we still need to see how it is implemented moving forward. Is capital flow really that simple to ease pressure? I'm a bit skeptical.

View OriginalReply0

degenonymous

· 01-09 07:17

Traditional finance is busy sucking blood, while we're actually bleeding? This move is really brilliant. MSCI not kicking us out is the way to go; it’s about time, so we don’t scare the market every day. Relief from selling pressure sounds good, but ETFs are still moving money, will there really be a rebound? 235 billion has already flowed into stocks, crypto has really been somewhat neglected. Just waiting for the reaction after the February confirmation, then we can see clearly whether the market is truly stable or just pretending to be stable.

View OriginalReply0

NFTragedy

· 01-09 07:16

It's all MSCI's fault, scaring a bunch of people to run away, then turning around and saying they won't kick them out? This inconsistency is really something. Money is flowing out, but selling pressure is easing? Sounds good, but it feels a bit like sitting on the fence. Traditional finance has poured in 235 billion, while we're still pulling out. The contrast is too stark. MSCI confirms that not removing them can help stability? Looking forward to the subsequent market trend not reversing again. Really? Every time it's just a scare before things calm down.

View OriginalReply0

LootboxPhobia

· 01-09 07:09

Traditional finance is bottom-fishing, while we're cutting losses. LOL. This round of MSCI probably reassured the market.

View OriginalReply0

PumpDoctrine

· 01-09 07:07

Traditional financial vampires are bottoming out, while we're cutting losses—it's really ironic. However, MSCI's move to rescue the market has at least given some confidence, though I'm worried it might just be a false alarm. The easing of selling pressure sounds good, but I have to ask—when will we truly see a rebound? Honestly, we still have to wait for the big players to re-enter the market; retail investors are just bystanders for now. MSCI's decision came just in time, better than just sitting and waiting for death. The perpetual bulls are still holding on desperately, and even hoping for a rebound is so difficult. Honestly, I just want to ask—this time, won't the market plunge again? Is the capital flow stable? It feels more like someone is secretly manipulating the rhythm.

View OriginalReply0