Smart contracts are good at executing rules but not good at handling large files—this is a common challenge for blockchain developers. Walrus has come up with a solution: have contracts reference verifiable data blocks instead of piling everything onto the chain.
In simple terms, it's like installing a "trusted external hard drive" for smart contracts. Contracts don't need to store specific byte data but can verify that data blocks indeed exist, who paid for them, and what the current version is. This "contract-aware" storage is achieved through cryptographic commitments and on-chain pointers.
When uploading files, Walrus records an tamper-proof digital fingerprint on Sui. The smart contract then verifies this fingerprint to execute corresponding logic (renewal, access control, or triggering payments). The entire process remains lightweight. There's no need to upload massive data during execution, nor to trust a centralized server.
This approach opens up new possibilities: governance proposals can reference immutable evidence, DeFi applications can rely on certified datasets, and blockchain games can link assets to verifiable content. Developers' code becomes simpler, and guarantees for off-chain data become even stronger.
The core idea is "separation but accountability"—fast execution with deterministic results, scalable and persistent storage, cryptography-based interfaces, and contracts that can verify key data at any time. It's not magic; it's about using testable, elegant design to run real applications based on real data, without breaking the fundamental rules of blockchain.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerNgmi
· 15h ago
Finally someone thought of this point. Storing data on-chain is really a foolish idea that wastes gas.
This idea is good—digital fingerprint verification, with the contract only handling logic and not storage. It should have been implemented a long time ago.
To be honest, blockchain games need this the most; otherwise, the cost of storing large files skyrockets, and projects go bankrupt.
The Walrus idea has some potential, but whether the Sui ecosystem has enough user base is another matter.
Verifiable external storage? Sounds like passing the problem to the middleware layer, but it still depends on how the specific implementation is done.
Data verification in DeFi is indeed a necessity; many projects have failed before due to data issues.
Separate storage but ensuring security—this scheme is theoretically sound, just worried about potential engineering pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
CodeSmellHunter
· 01-08 01:39
Someone finally filled the gap of file storage; it should have been done this way long ago.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhale
· 01-07 18:55
Isn't this the complete separation of the storage layer and execution layer? Someone should have done this a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChain
· 01-07 18:50
This idea is pretty good; finally, someone remembers to separate concerns.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrying
· 01-07 18:47
This is what I wanted to see. The on-chain storage pitfall has finally been seriously addressed.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-beba108d
· 01-07 18:44
Wow, someone finally thought of uninstalling the contract
---
This is exactly what I've been saying, piling data on-chain is just pure stupidity. Walrus's approach is indeed clear-headed
---
Wait, does this mean the risk of DeFi flash loans can actually be controlled?
---
Sounds good, but it still depends on the acceptance of the Sui ecosystem. Hopefully it’s not just a show that’s popular but not practical
---
Cryptographic commitments... Can this stuff really be used by ordinary developers? I'm a bit worried
---
Haha, installing external hard drives on contracts—what a perfect analogy. Finally, a way to cure those bloated contracts
---
Trustworthy? Are cryptographic commitments really reliable? What about the details, the details
---
Is there hope for blockchain games? I want to dive deeper into asset-linked verifiable content
---
If you don’t break the basic rules of blockchain, scalability can still be achieved. That’s the right way
---
Feels like more Sui marketing. Let’s see real applications and implementations first
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketGardener
· 01-07 18:42
Wow, someone finally broke through this bottleneck. Walrus's approach is truly clever.
No need to put everything on the chain in contracts; just install a "trusted hard drive," and the authenticity is guaranteed by cryptography... I need to ponder this idea.
DeFi and blockchain games should be able to breathe a sigh of relief now, with data verification + low cost, much more enjoyable than those previous workarounds.
Smart contracts are good at executing rules but not good at handling large files—this is a common challenge for blockchain developers. Walrus has come up with a solution: have contracts reference verifiable data blocks instead of piling everything onto the chain.
In simple terms, it's like installing a "trusted external hard drive" for smart contracts. Contracts don't need to store specific byte data but can verify that data blocks indeed exist, who paid for them, and what the current version is. This "contract-aware" storage is achieved through cryptographic commitments and on-chain pointers.
When uploading files, Walrus records an tamper-proof digital fingerprint on Sui. The smart contract then verifies this fingerprint to execute corresponding logic (renewal, access control, or triggering payments). The entire process remains lightweight. There's no need to upload massive data during execution, nor to trust a centralized server.
This approach opens up new possibilities: governance proposals can reference immutable evidence, DeFi applications can rely on certified datasets, and blockchain games can link assets to verifiable content. Developers' code becomes simpler, and guarantees for off-chain data become even stronger.
The core idea is "separation but accountability"—fast execution with deterministic results, scalable and persistent storage, cryptography-based interfaces, and contracts that can verify key data at any time. It's not magic; it's about using testable, elegant design to run real applications based on real data, without breaking the fundamental rules of blockchain.