Have you ever experienced this—opening an old folder and finding that what you once saved has disappeared? It sounds like a common annoyance, but in the blockchain world, it becomes a deadly risk.
Imagine: your NFT ownership is recorded on the chain, but what about the images and metadata it points to? Perhaps they were quietly lost on a server. Maybe the original data source has been shut down. Verification becomes an illusion.
Many people in the blockchain ecosystem choose to turn a blind eye; after all, the reputation of "decentralization" is already loud. But Walrus doesn’t think so. It treats data issues as a hard requirement.
What exactly does it do? It splits files into encoded fragments and disperses them across numerous independent nodes for storage. The advantage of this design is: even if several nodes go offline, the entire file can still be recovered. The system’s redundancy is high enough that a single point of failure doesn’t threaten data integrity.
This is the charm of distributed storage—it doesn’t rely on a centralized storage provider but depends on mathematics and network topology to ensure availability. To some extent, this is the true meaning of "permanent on the chain."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DefiOldTrickster
· 5h ago
Haha, this is what I want to say—most projects are just hyping up permanence, but in the end, the data still runs away. I’ve fallen for this before; when the metadata server pointed to by an NFT shuts down, it’s incredibly despairing. Walrus’s decentralized and fragmented approach definitely has some substance; compared to those overly hyped schemes that only harvest profits from newcomers, it’s much more reliable.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 01-08 10:27
The image link for the NFT becomes 404 after a month, which is a very common issue. Walrus's approach is indeed reliable; distributed fragmented storage is the correct solution.
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlpha
· 01-07 17:51
Finally, someone dares to address this issue... I've really seen too many cases of NFT metadata loss.
The Walrus solution sounds pretty good; decentralized fragmented storage is indeed much more reliable than relying on a single point.
But honestly, how many projects can actually use this system? Most people are just pretending they haven't seen anything.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 01-07 17:51
Is that the truth about NFTs? On-chain permanence is just a joke, off-chain data still isn't gone just because you say so. Walrus's distributed approach actually has some substance.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 01-07 17:40
Bought a bunch of NFTs, only to find out later that the images they point to are gone. Such a huge loss, really.
View OriginalReply0
RugResistant
· 01-07 17:30
nah walrus actually gets it... most projects just handwave the data persistence problem lol
Reply0
MetaMisfit
· 01-07 17:28
The image pointed to by the NFT has been a 404 for a long time. Who doesn't know that?
Have you ever experienced this—opening an old folder and finding that what you once saved has disappeared? It sounds like a common annoyance, but in the blockchain world, it becomes a deadly risk.
Imagine: your NFT ownership is recorded on the chain, but what about the images and metadata it points to? Perhaps they were quietly lost on a server. Maybe the original data source has been shut down. Verification becomes an illusion.
Many people in the blockchain ecosystem choose to turn a blind eye; after all, the reputation of "decentralization" is already loud. But Walrus doesn’t think so. It treats data issues as a hard requirement.
What exactly does it do? It splits files into encoded fragments and disperses them across numerous independent nodes for storage. The advantage of this design is: even if several nodes go offline, the entire file can still be recovered. The system’s redundancy is high enough that a single point of failure doesn’t threaten data integrity.
This is the charm of distributed storage—it doesn’t rely on a centralized storage provider but depends on mathematics and network topology to ensure availability. To some extent, this is the true meaning of "permanent on the chain."