2026-01-07 17:21:05

Have you ever jumped into a mining pool with an annualized 500% return? Most likely, you've also experienced a journey from paradise to hell. This time, I want to discuss a different perspective—rather than chasing sensational APY numbers, it's better to understand the true essence of returns.

The ListaDAO project has made me rethink what "real收益" means. Its returns are not generated out of thin air; they can be broken down into three parts: first, the native staking rewards of the collateral assets themselves, which are ongoing; second, the interest spread income generated from lending activities within the protocol; third, the revenue sharing brought by ecological partnerships. These three components are not one-time gains but are capable of long-term, cyclical income.

What does holding $LISTA mean? You're not just earning high interest; more importantly, you're gaining participation rights in this收益 engine. Through governance voting, you can influence key protocol decisions—such as adjusting collateral ratios to ensure system security or supporting the integration of new asset types to expand收益 sources. This is the true value of blockchain governance.

Many people are still "hoping to find the next hundredfold," but ListaDAO shows us a different approach: instead of gambling on a single coin, it's about designing participation in a system that can genuinely make money. Once you understand this difference, the choice becomes clear.

LISTA-0,29%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BrokenRugs

· 01-09 06:00

Hey, wait a minute. These three sources of income sound stable, but I still feel like we need to see if the ecosystem can survive...

View OriginalReply0

HodlVeteran

· 01-09 02:21

Buddy, I saw annualized 500% back in 2017. Just being alive now is pretty good [laugh]. I've been taught this many times. Look carefully—real returns are only as good as one word—sustainable. The LISTA logic is indeed a hundred times more reliable than dreaming every day, but it still depends on whether the ecosystem survives or not. Governance voting? Honestly, retail investors' voting rights are just that—depends on how the big players play. I like the saying "no gambling," but what I gamble on is whether the protocol risk will explode. Stay alert, don’t be blinded by high yields.

View OriginalReply0

MevHunter

· 01-07 17:50

The true profit model needs to be analyzed separately; it's not just about a hundredfold annualized return.

View OriginalReply0

MentalWealthHarvester

· 01-07 17:50

Buddy, you're right. I’ve been burned by those 500% annualized returns before. Now I only trust projects that can reliably generate cash flow. The real logic behind making money is like this: staking + lending + ecosystem distribution, each link connected, unlike those air coins that evaporate overnight. Governance rights are indeed easy to overlook. Only projects where you can influence the protocol’s direction are worth holding long-term. I'm also looking at LISTA now. Just based on this logical framework, it feels much more reliable. Compared to chasing high APY every day, it’s better to find something with real cash flow support—that way, you can sleep peacefully. I’m not joking. After experiencing several crashes, I now only trust projects that can clearly explain where the returns come from. This is what Web3 should look like—participating in the system’s operation rather than pure gambling.

View OriginalReply0

MevHunter

· 01-07 17:47

You guys are still chasing 500% APY? I fell into that trap last year and lost everything in one go. However, the logic behind Lista is indeed clear-headed. Staking + lending + distribution, circulating and flowing, is the real way to go. It's much more reliable than those get-rich-quick broken mining pools. Governance rights are truly interesting. Being able to vote and make decisions feels great, unlike before when I just held coins foolishly waiting to be exploited.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropFreedom

· 01-07 17:45

Collateral assets, interest spread, ecosystem distribution... this logic is indeed more rational than simply chasing APY, but how does it work in practice? Governance voting still involves a game with a bunch of big players, and retail investors' voting power remains an issue.

View OriginalReply0

PhantomMiner

· 01-07 17:37

It's the same kind of "real profit" claim... I've heard it too many times, and in the end, it's just newcomers taking the fall.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainUndercover

· 01-07 17:36

A 500% mining pool has long been compromised; entering it is equivalent to taking a bag-holder role. This time, the topic is well-chosen. Honestly, the cycle of collateral yield + interest spread + ecosystem distribution is indeed much more reliable than those pie-in-the-sky projects. Governance voting is quite interesting, but it depends on whether the community is genuine or not. Another wave of advice telling me to give up the hundredfold dream, haha.

View OriginalReply0

StableNomad

· 01-07 17:29

ngl this reminds me of UST in May... everyone was saying "look at the *real* yield structure" and then... yeah. but statistically speaking, the three-part revenue split here is less janky than most. risk-adjusted returns actually checking out for once?

Reply0