Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
There is a misconception among many projects.
They think media exposure is just for gaining fame. In reality, good reporting should help you earn trust.
The influence of reputable media is not about increasing followers. Its role is to make investors, communities, and market participants see you as a worthy investment. Traffic alone is useless. An in-depth analysis from an authoritative media outlet is far more effective than ten superficial marketing posts.
What do people look at first when considering investing in a project? They check whether the team has been consistently covered by recognized industry media. The quality of information always beats the quantity.
A bunch of crappy hot topics are not as solid as an analysis from CoinDesk.
Ah, projects still selling hot topics really should reflect on themselves.
Endorsement from authoritative media is the real deal; everything else is虚的.
Exactly, I only decide whether to invest based on whether the media认可.
A deep investigation by CoinDesk truly outweighs ten small marketing accounts.
Investors don't care about follower counts; they look at media endorsements.
Quality will always surpass quantity, this logic couldn't be simpler.
If something is repeatedly covered by mainstream media, there's no need to hype it yourself.
Truly reliable builders should let the reports speak for themselves.
Quality > Quantity, this is so true. I'd rather read a deep analysis from ChainNews than a hundred pieces of trash from marketing accounts.
---
I'm really puzzled, why are so many crypto projects still piling up fluff content? Doesn't anyone tell them it's useless?
---
Quality over quantity, this phrase can't be overstated in Web3. I've seen too many projects built on marketing hype, but in the end, they still have to prove their strength.
---
Investors' first impression is who has reported on you, this has become an industry consensus. Truly reliable projects understand this principle.
---
What’s the point of fame? The key is whether VCs and institutions trust you—that's the real value of media exposure.
---
In-depth analysis far surpasses ten marketing slogans. The logic is simple, but the number of projects that execute it well is pitiful.
---
They've all understood the importance of quality, yet some projects keep flooding the screens and exhausting everyone. It's really frustrating.
---
Continuous coverage by authoritative media can indeed prove the value, far beyond self-promotional hype.
Authoritative media coverage is an endorsement of credibility; it's the hard currency for fundraising and establishing market position.
Quality > Quantity—this principle many people haven't grasped, which is sad.