Most vesting models carry a hidden flaw—it's not really about the lock itself. The real issue is the concentrated pressure they create.



Think about it: when everyone's allocation unlocks on the same schedule, the market faces a coordinated wave of selling pressure. Tokens hit circulation, prices take the hit, and investors who waited through the lock period watch their positions get diluted.

But what if there's another way?

Innovative projects are rethinking this from the ground up. Instead of passive locked allocations sitting idle, some protocols are transforming them into active, productive assets. These mechanisms turn what was dead capital into something that generates returns while maintaining the integrity of the token release schedule.

The shift from static vesting to dynamic participation models could be a game-changer for how projects manage their tokenomics and community incentives going forward.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NftBankruptcyClubvip
· 01-10 06:22
Wow, turns out the trap with vesting isn't in the lock-up itself, but in the pressure from that wave of concentrated dumping... I've suspected there's a problem with this mechanism for a long time.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 01-09 19:08
Haha, yet another vesting savior... After all these years, it's still the same tricks.
View OriginalReply0
WalletAnxietyPatientvip
· 01-07 16:02
Ha, it's the usual routine of dumping the market again.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictimvip
· 01-07 16:01
Unlocking the trend and dumping the market right away—I'm tired of this routine... But speaking of turning locked tokens into interest-earning assets? That idea seems to have some potential.
View OriginalReply0
TideRecedervip
· 01-07 16:01
I do remember that in the past, those project unlocks were all rushed in at once, which really led to heavy losses. The idea of dynamic participation sounds smooth, but I don't know if any projects have actually been implemented successfully.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapienvip
· 01-07 15:58
Hey, well said... Unlocking and crashing the market together is really annoying, it’s like a time bomb every time.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHighvip
· 01-07 15:55
It looks like the old trick again, treating locked positions as a cure-all... Actually, the problem isn't whether it can be withdrawn, but in that moment when each wave of unlocking causes a dump, how can the price escape? But on the other hand, the idea of reviving dead money is indeed fresh, just not sure if it will turn into another trap to cut leeks in practice.
View OriginalReply0
Web3Educatorvip
· 01-07 15:33
tbh this reframes vesting entirely... the synchronized unlock cliff thing is lowkey brutal for price action, ngl
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)