2026-01-07 15:29:12

Privacy is becoming the true controller of on-chain finance. This realization is increasingly clear in the market today.

Assets flow freely between different public blockchains, but sensitive data must be protected — it is this asymmetry that creates a lasting competitive advantage.

More and more projects realize that a financial system without a privacy layer is inherently flawed. From transaction records to position information, the transparency of all data can bring openness on the chain but also limits the depth of mechanism applications.

This is why some teams are systematically building privacy infrastructure — not as a functional module, but as the underlying architecture of on-chain finance. In the long run, these solutions will define the competitive landscape of the next generation of DeFi.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HashRatePhilosopher

· 3h ago

Honestly, a chain without privacy is just naked running. Who would dare to play? The privacy underlying architecture is indeed the next key point; it should have been prioritized long ago. Transparency is transparency, but who can stand having their holdings fully exposed... We need to guard against whales. Wait, could this approach instead be seen as a tool for money laundering... How do regulators view this? Making privacy a standard feature is the only way for DeFi to truly get off the ground. With a solid underlying architecture, no matter how much others innovate, they have to look at your face—it's truly tough. I like the idea of an asymmetric competitive advantage; whoever stabilizes privacy first wins.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerAirdrop

· 01-09 02:47

To be honest, privacy has been underestimated for too long. Everyone keeps shouting about transparency, but in the end, their positions are completely exposed... Thinking back to the stories of big players being targeted, privacy layers should indeed become infrastructure rather than an optional feature. Underlying privacy > superficial prosperity, this time I’m not joking.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainBard

· 01-07 16:17

Honestly, privacy should have been prioritized long ago. Previously, we were blinded by transparency. It's obvious that the next breakout point is privacy—whoever gets their privacy infrastructure right first will win. This isn't just a feature upgrade; it's a complete overhaul of the underlying logic. Get it? DeFi without privacy? That’s really just a decoration. Feels like only now people are catching on... I've been watching the privacy track all along.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlady

· 01-07 15:58

Honestly, being frontrun on the transparent chain every day has finally made someone realize the importance of privacy. Speaking of which, the privacy layer is truly a necessity. Without it, how can large transactions be conducted? Those in the know have already started laying out plans in this area. The next wave of DeFi will depend on whose privacy infrastructure is more solid. It seems that those who once boasted "everything on the chain is transparent" should now be eating their words. Privacy ≈ a competitive barrier. This logic is sound.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter

· 01-07 15:58

Hey, honestly, the transparency of the mempool has always been my pain point—now even holdings are exposed, increasing the risk of sandwich attacks, and gas wars are happening every day... If the privacy layer could truly be built into the underlying infrastructure, then arbitrage bots would have a much easier time.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeDodger

· 01-07 15:55

That's right, privacy is indeed the bottleneck right now.

View OriginalReply0

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 01-07 15:50

I've heard this argument before. Back in 2018, Zcash also claimed that privacy was the future. But what happened? Nowadays, privacy coins are almost impossible to list on exchanges. Project teams are best at making big promises about "underlying architecture," but when it comes to real implementation, it's a different story altogether.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiNotNakamoto

· 01-07 15:39

Honestly, privacy has been seriously underestimated. Those still touting transparency will eventually suffer losses. But the idea of underlying infrastructure sounds expensive... and it might end up becoming a playground for the big players. Algorithmic stablecoins can even collapse; is privacy infrastructure really reliable? I just want to know how these people walk the tightrope between privacy and compliance—one misstep and it's all over.

View OriginalReply0

YieldChaser

· 01-07 15:36

Honestly, privacy has indeed been underestimated. It's a bit late to realize this now for some projects. Transparency and privacy are truly a trade-off; you can't have both at the same time. You need to think clearly about what you want. Privacy design at the underlying architecture level is the correct approach; surface-level features are simply not enough. Wait until true privacy DeFi comes out; at that point, all these will need to be reshuffled. Privacy is a hard requirement; without it, you will be directly pushed out of the competition. Everyone wants to see through others' wallets, no one wants to be seen through haha. Who can make privacy a foundational infrastructure in this round will win big. Having your holdings completely exposed—who can stand that? Finally, someone is paying attention to this issue.

View OriginalReply0