How do you seriously launch a meme coin on Abstract if you're clearly not bullish on the chain itself? That contradiction alone is a massive warning sign.
Look at $NOOT—this was textbook case material. The team picked Abstract not because they believed in the ecosystem, but purely to capitalize on new chain hype and flip for quick gains. That kind of opportunism doesn't build credibility.
When founders are publicly bearish on their own platform, investors should be asking hard questions about their real intentions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SelfStaking
· 01-09 23:20
To be honest, this kind of on-chain token issuance that even they don't believe in is purely a scheme to harvest retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalal
· 01-08 10:41
Honestly, this approach is too lousy. They don't even believe their own coin can make money when building the chain. $NOOT is just a negative example.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrain
· 01-07 15:59
To be honest, this is a typical bottom-fishing game, and the team never really thought about the long term.
View OriginalReply0
Lonely_Validator
· 01-07 15:56
This is just outrageous, it looks so awkward... How can the team be proud to put a chain they don't even believe in themselves?
View OriginalReply0
CoinBasedThinking
· 01-07 15:52
This is outrageous. You don't even believe in the chain yourself, and you're still issuing tokens? Isn't this just blatantly scamming retail investors?
View OriginalReply0
Rugpull幸存者
· 01-07 15:52
Isn't this a typical money-grabbing scheme? I've seen through the NOOT incident a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 01-07 15:40
Isn't this a classic case of "I don't believe in Abstract but I cut leeks on Abstract"? LOL, who would trust a team like this?
View OriginalReply0
DisillusiionOracle
· 01-07 15:36
This is a typical scammer's logic—doubting the chain while issuing tokens on it. Wake up, everyone.
How do you seriously launch a meme coin on Abstract if you're clearly not bullish on the chain itself? That contradiction alone is a massive warning sign.
Look at $NOOT—this was textbook case material. The team picked Abstract not because they believed in the ecosystem, but purely to capitalize on new chain hype and flip for quick gains. That kind of opportunism doesn't build credibility.
When founders are publicly bearish on their own platform, investors should be asking hard questions about their real intentions.