2026-01-07 15:27:52

Binance Life's aesthetic setting has never quite convinced me, and the long-term prospects are worrying. The most awkward point is that Binance Life, as one of the first projects launched, has instead amplified the label effect of the leading series, which has tightly bound the entire ecosystem together. Originally, Hakimi was gradually shedding the influence of Binance Life's price fluctuations and beginning to form an independent market trend, but now, with just one spot news, Hakimi's movement is immediately re-anchored. This passive binding situation is really damaging; to break free and become independent again, I don't know how much time and opportunity costs will be wasted. The market should allow quality projects to develop their own narratives, rather than being constrained by artificially imposed frameworks.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DAOdreamer

· 16h ago

Oh no, we're caught in a cycle again. This is internal ecosystem conflict—when the leader moves, the entire army is wiped out.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 01-10 06:40

Hakimi has been pulled back again this time, truly incredible. Clearly about to go independent but forcibly anchored back, this kind of passive feeling is really a loss.

View OriginalReply0

ruggedSoBadLMAO

· 01-07 15:57

The leading effect is truly a double-edged sword. To put it simply, the ecosystem gets hijacked. It's both anchored and rerunning, how can high-quality projects stand out if this continues?

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekNewSickle

· 01-07 15:41

It's the same old story, when the leader moves, the whole market follows. To put it plainly, it's just one batch after another being cut. Hakiimi wants to be independent? Forget it, ecosystem binding is the project team's favorite safety fuse—you can't run away. Instead of studying narrative frameworks, it's better to first consider who holds the chips... Just for your reference, everyone. The term "opportunity cost" sounds nice, but in reality, it's just self-comfort before losing everything.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullAlertOfficer

· 01-07 15:32

Here we go again with this set? The old trick of leading projects hostage to the entire ecosystem, tired of it --- Hakimi's independence is not that easy to achieve; being anchored for so long --- Aesthetic settings drag down the project, ecosystem involution, can't blame the project team --- Talking harshly about wasting opportunity costs, what are those entering now betting on? --- Narrative framework is a shackle, breaking free is harder than climbing to the sky --- Pessimistic outlook +1, feels like this wave is going to have problems --- Passive binding is poison; a project should have broken through by now

View OriginalReply0