2026-01-07 15:27:20

NFT collectors often overlook a harsh reality — often what you buy is just a link pointing to a centralized server. Once that server goes down, your digital collectible instantly becomes worthless.

The root of this problem lies in trust. Traditional link-based storage solutions entrust the lifeline of digital assets to third parties. Once the centralized node is offline, previous investments and value vanish in an instant.

The emergence of decentralized storage protocols has changed this situation. By storing NFT metadata and media files across a distributed network of nodes, digital assets truly achieve a lifecycle comparable to that of the blockchain. This "always online" feature provides each digital asset with a dual guarantee against server failures and human deletion.

Imagine — digital artworks, game equipment, virtual property certificates — these are permanently embedded into the decentralized network. No one can delete them, no one can shut them down. They exist there, alongside the blockchain.

The wave of tokenizing real-world assets has just begun. Proofs of ownership for goods, real estate certificates — these involve real money and require extremely high storage security. Once the market recognizes the value of high-security storage, demand in this sector will explode.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SmartContractPlumber

· 01-10 08:06

That's correct. The IPFS solution looks great, but in actual deployment, there are a bunch of vulnerabilities. Several projects I've audited have failed in access control. The premise of data being "permanently online" is that your node incentive mechanism is free of re-entrancy vulnerabilities.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeePhobia

· 01-08 11:38

Another centralized trap, I've said it before If I had known so many people would still be getting cut, I might as well go directly to Arweave or IPFS Promising to be online forever, but who will pay the bill? Wait, this logic still has a problem... RWA is indeed attractive, but when that day comes, will the market switch to a new story again?

View OriginalReply0

FortuneTeller42

· 01-07 15:56

If I had known earlier, I wouldn't have bought those images. Damn, huge loss.

View OriginalReply0

InscriptionGriller

· 01-07 15:43

On the day centralized servers went down, how many people's "digital assets" turned into JPG waste? That's the most heartbreaking truth about NFTs. That said, decentralized storage sounds interesting, but would you really dare to put something as valuable as real estate certificates on the chain? The market isn't that naive yet.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMigrant

· 01-07 15:42

It's about time I said this, my JPG friends are still fooling themselves. Once the server is shut down, the game is over—that's the power of centralization. RWA (Real-World Assets) are the future, just thinking about tokenizing real estate makes me excited. Here comes the link theory again; every time, someone gets cut. Decentralized storage needs to become widespread, or everything is just a castle in the air. This storage track is about to explode; whoever gets in first wins. At the end of the day, it's still a trust issue; solid commitments are necessary.

View OriginalReply0

MetaLord420

· 01-07 15:41

Another centralized trap, I've seen through it long ago. Luckily, I haven't invested all my assets in this junk.

View OriginalReply0