2026-01-07 15:23:58

The PBP team's statement about terminating PvP is confusing, especially since they are still promoting the development of the test version. In contrast, BOMP truly pioneered this track and has a natural advantage as one of the first practitioners — its launchpad platform is nearly complete. Here's a thought-provoking question: whom do you trust more? Those who propose ideas and build from scratch, or followers who wait to see others explore and then rush to follow? In this rapidly iterative market, being proactive and catching up later often determines the long-term vitality of a project.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MerkleTreeHugger

· 17h ago

PBP's recent moves are indeed a bit chaotic, stopping just like that—are they still testing? Early adopters definitely have the advantage; BOMp made the right move. Follow-the-leader players will eventually catch up; there's nothing new. Who the hell believes these verbal promises? Let the data speak. Launchpad is almost complete—that's real strength. Innovation and plagiarism are two different things; the market will choose.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTherapist

· 21h ago

PBP this operation really can't hold up. Saying to terminate while still testing— isn't that self-contradictory? BOMP has been seriously working on it from the very beginning. Now that launchpad is almost out, the gap is obvious.

View OriginalReply0

AmateurDAOWatcher

· 22h ago

PBP's recent moves are quite confusing; they say they've stopped development but are still continuing? BOMP, on the other hand, is more reliable, and the launchpad is almost ready.

View OriginalReply0

UncleWhale

· 01-10 05:18

PBP's words are really profound, the test hasn't even finished yet and it's already terminated? The logic doesn't quite hold up. BOMP did indeed benefit from being the first to catch the wave, but being first doesn't necessarily mean winning... Let's see how the subsequent execution goes. This circle is like this, innovators and followers are always competing, and who to trust depends on the code. Wait, is PBP really going to cut the PVP feature? Then the roadmap would be pointless... If BOMP's launchpad really gets implemented, it can indeed secure a position, but don't get too confident—there are many pitfalls in Web3. First-mover advantage sounds easy to say, but whether you can hold onto it is the real question. History has shown many have failed.

View OriginalReply0

Token_Sherpa

· 01-07 15:53

pbp's messaging is genuinely confusing ngl... they're still building beta but claiming to pivot? that's some serious misalignment vibes right there

Reply0

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 01-07 15:47

PBP's recent actions are a bit reckless. Saying they're giving up on PVP but still messing around with the test version... Isn't this just a disguised way of abandoning the project? BOMP is indeed fierce. The first to take the risk is never afraid of later entrants. Launchpad is almost taking shape.

View OriginalReply0

NFTPessimist

· 01-07 15:43

Hmm... PBP's recent actions are indeed a bit face-slapping. The testing is still ongoing, and they called a stop to PvP. I haven't fully understood the logic behind this. BOMP is indeed the first to take a bite, but being first doesn't necessarily mean you'll win, as history shows. Don't trust anyone's promises too much; the key is whether the launchpad can truly deliver. Things move quickly in this circle, but reliable projects tend to be slow. Just think about it. What's wrong with following the trend later? Maybe they just learned to be smart. Many innovators also end up dying early.

View OriginalReply0

YieldWhisperer

· 01-07 15:38

PBP's recent actions are indeed outrageous. They say they are terminating PVP verbally, but are still developing behind the scenes—typical of a tug-of-war between the left and right hands. BOMP is the one actually getting things done. The launchpad is almost wrapped up, and this is the confidence of a first mover.

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 01-07 15:36

To put it simply, PBP's recent moves are a bit disappointing. On one hand, they say it's terminated, but on the other hand, testing is still ongoing. I really can't understand this mindset. BOMP is indeed strong, and Launchpad is about to be launched. The difference is like the gap between the front wave and the back wave of surfing—standing on the crest and chasing the spray are simply on different levels. The liquidity depth of the early movers is already there, and later participants trying harder are just drinking soup.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-07 15:35

PBP's recent actions are really disappointing—saying stop just like that, and the test version isn't even out yet. The logic behind it is truly incredible. BOMP definitely has the advantage of being first, and Launchpad is almost here, much better than those who just talk big. The gap between pioneers and followers is clear in this market.

View OriginalReply0