Recently, there has been an interesting phenomenon—many industry insiders are actively discussing the future direction of the financial system. According to some public information, major global political and economic figures are beginning to reassess traditional financial structures, believing that on-chain assets and decentralized finance models could become important components of the future.
What is the logic behind this? First, the performance of mainstream crypto assets like ETH, BTC, SOL, and others over the past few years is changing investors' perceptions of digital assets. Second, an increasing number of institutions and policymakers are starting to consider whether asset digitization and on-chain settlement can improve financial efficiency.
A question worth pondering is: if the traditional financial system truly faces structural adjustments, will asset on-chainization become an inevitable trend? What does this mean for the crypto market?
Honestly, there is no definitive answer yet. But from the perspectives of policy signals, technological progress, and institutional participation, there are indeed many positive signs. Some choose to seize this window to increase their positions, while others prefer to continue observing. Regardless of the choice, understanding these changes is important.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
UncommonNPC
· 1h ago
Really, the big shots are finally going to get on the chain? I knew it, just wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
GmGmNoGn
· 4h ago
Window period? Buddy, this is just a bubble period, don't be fooled by policy signals.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPrince
· 01-06 22:53
The bull market is coming, right? Is this really different this time? Why do I always feel like I hear this every time...
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiHeir
· 01-06 22:53
It should be pointed out that there are obvious flaws in the argumentative framework of this article. On-chain assets have never been an "inevitable trend," but rather a gradual process of building value consensus—according to the fundamental ideas of the white paper, Satoshi Nakamoto never promised that traditional finance would automatically migrate to the chain. These are two different dimensions. Currently, everyone is talking about "positive policy signals," but on-chain data shows that the actual institutional holdings are completely disproportionate to the hype. It's amusing—another FOMO tactic rooted in fiat thinking—using vague "window periods" to imply urgency.
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoer
· 01-06 22:46
I have to say, this wave is really uncertain... Big institutions talk nicely, but in reality, they're still harvesting the little guys. But it is indeed somewhat interesting.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCollector
· 01-06 22:44
This wave of signals is indeed a bit different; the big players are starting to seriously look at on-chain assets.
---
People adding positions are probably secretly celebrating now; I've heard that window period mentioned many times.
---
To put it simply, policies are gradually aligning, and asset on-chain is only a matter of time.
---
Technological progress + institutional entry, this combination is quite powerful.
---
The performance of BTC and ETH over the past few years won't deceive anyone; those who need to wake up already have.
---
Let's wait and see; anyway, the window period is still long.
---
Is decentralized finance an inevitable trend? I believe only half of it; it still depends on how each country’s policies follow up.
---
Always talking about structural adjustments, but in the end, it still depends on who moves real money first.
---
Those adding positions now and those waiting on the sidelines are probably betting on each other's decisions, haha.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 01-06 22:37
Uh... talking about asset on-chain being an inevitable trend again? Wake up, policy signals are the biggest liars.
Recently, there has been an interesting phenomenon—many industry insiders are actively discussing the future direction of the financial system. According to some public information, major global political and economic figures are beginning to reassess traditional financial structures, believing that on-chain assets and decentralized finance models could become important components of the future.
What is the logic behind this? First, the performance of mainstream crypto assets like ETH, BTC, SOL, and others over the past few years is changing investors' perceptions of digital assets. Second, an increasing number of institutions and policymakers are starting to consider whether asset digitization and on-chain settlement can improve financial efficiency.
A question worth pondering is: if the traditional financial system truly faces structural adjustments, will asset on-chainization become an inevitable trend? What does this mean for the crypto market?
Honestly, there is no definitive answer yet. But from the perspectives of policy signals, technological progress, and institutional participation, there are indeed many positive signs. Some choose to seize this window to increase their positions, while others prefer to continue observing. Regardless of the choice, understanding these changes is important.