2026-01-06 22:20:20

If you're evaluating utility rather than just chasing token rewards, the calculus shifts pretty fast. When emission mechanics don't align with actual usage, people naturally gravitate elsewhere. Worth looking at what C8ntinuum and TauntCoin are building differently—whether their tokenomics create better incentive structures or if they're solving real problems in the space. It's a good reminder that long-term value typically flows to projects with genuine adoption fundamentals, not just hype cycles.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingerProfit

· 01-09 00:38

ngl True builders are like this, not following the trend of chasing air coins

View OriginalReply0

CryptoHistoryClass

· 01-08 18:02

nah this is literally just 2017 all over again. checked the charts—emission mechanics breaking adoption? we've seen this movie before with every failed L1 that promised "real utility"

Reply0

LazyDevMiner

· 01-07 03:25

Hey, you're right. Projects that only do airdrops really deserve to die.

View OriginalReply0

DefiEngineerJack

· 01-06 22:32

nah this is just cope for when your bags aren't mooning, tbh. emission mechanics matter but so does actual market demand—show me the onchain data or stop larping about "fundamentals"

Reply0

SeasonedInvestor

· 01-06 22:29

This thing, a truly good project still depends on whether it can be genuinely used; just issuing tokens is useless.

View OriginalReply0

MevHunter

· 01-06 22:28

Honestly, real adoption is the true hard currency; just flashy tokenomics won't cut it.

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 01-06 22:24

Honestly, this is the truth. Many projects rely on emission to survive; without users, they will die.