Recently, on major social platforms, I've seen quite a few discussions about community Meme coins like "2026 Shang Shang Qian," and I think it's worth analyzing the early participation logic.

These types of projects have several obvious characteristics. First, they are purely community-driven—without deep involvement from VC institutions, relying entirely on retail consensus. The narrative of Eastern culture and the anticipation of good luck in the New Year indeed resonate easily. Second, the hype comes quickly, especially when a topic explodes on short-video platforms, with the spread and viral growth far surpassing traditional projects. Additionally, the entry barrier is quite low—holding a certain amount can be achieved with just a few yuan or even a few cents, which makes many people willing to try with their pocket money.

From this perspective, there is indeed an early window for community Meme coins. But how should one participate rationally? The key phrase is four characters: small-scale trial and error. The early stage is essentially the period of the most severe information asymmetry—there may be hundredfold opportunities, but it can also vanish instantly. While pure community cohesion can drive prices initially, how fragile this consensus is is obvious—once sentiment wanes, the decline often outpaces the rise.

It’s important to clarify the risks: community coins and Meme coins lack substantive value support. Their prices are entirely influenced by market sentiment, community enthusiasm, project operations, technical vulnerabilities, and even policy changes. Risks like rug pulls, contract bugs, and large holders dumping are real and objective, not alarmist talk.

Therefore, if you really want to participate in such projects, I suggest treating it as a fun community consensus activity rather than a guaranteed profit opportunity. Use disposable funds that won’t affect your normal life if lost, never go all-in—that’s the basic rule for surviving long in this field. What’s your view?