When ETH climbed from 1400 to 3800, I fell into the classic trader’s dilemma. The rally seemed unstoppable, yet something whispered that alts would eventually catch up. So I waited—watching ETH consolidate, convinced the pullback would give me the perfect entry point.
The correction came, and I pounced. But instead of discipline, I brought caution that morphed into indecision. Batching in seemed smart on paper: spread risk, avoid FOMO, catch falling knives at multiple levels. The reality was different. PEPE became my test case—averaging down to 1150, planning calculated exits at 1110 and 1150.
The Market Had Other Plans
Not once did the market cooperate. One bearish candle erased key support lines. Alt season never materialized. Every fresh capital I deployed felt like throwing money into a void. Two strategic cuts to minimize losses paradoxically proved my most painful decisions—each one validating that the market had already made its verdict.
The arithmetic tells the story: 1.1 million became 920,000. That 180K deficit wasn’t a flash crash casualty. It was the cumulative price of averaging down into a collapsing trend, cutting losses late, and mistaking diversified entry points for risk management.
The Real Lesson
Batch buying isn’t insurance—it’s gambling with different timers. When direction flips, lower cost basis means nothing. The traders who survived weren’t the ones who entered at the cheapest prices; they were the ones who recognized the trend change earliest.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The 3800 Trap: How Strategic Entry Turned Into a 180K Lesson
When ETH climbed from 1400 to 3800, I fell into the classic trader’s dilemma. The rally seemed unstoppable, yet something whispered that alts would eventually catch up. So I waited—watching ETH consolidate, convinced the pullback would give me the perfect entry point.
The correction came, and I pounced. But instead of discipline, I brought caution that morphed into indecision. Batching in seemed smart on paper: spread risk, avoid FOMO, catch falling knives at multiple levels. The reality was different. PEPE became my test case—averaging down to 1150, planning calculated exits at 1110 and 1150.
The Market Had Other Plans
Not once did the market cooperate. One bearish candle erased key support lines. Alt season never materialized. Every fresh capital I deployed felt like throwing money into a void. Two strategic cuts to minimize losses paradoxically proved my most painful decisions—each one validating that the market had already made its verdict.
The arithmetic tells the story: 1.1 million became 920,000. That 180K deficit wasn’t a flash crash casualty. It was the cumulative price of averaging down into a collapsing trend, cutting losses late, and mistaking diversified entry points for risk management.
The Real Lesson
Batch buying isn’t insurance—it’s gambling with different timers. When direction flips, lower cost basis means nothing. The traders who survived weren’t the ones who entered at the cheapest prices; they were the ones who recognized the trend change earliest.