2025-12-26 20:20:33

Many crypto projects crash and burn not because the product is flawed, but because they're chasing too many problems simultaneously. The real winners? Those that drill deep into one core challenge and own it completely.

Take ADI Chain for example—they're not trying to be everything to everyone. Instead, they're building infrastructure specifically designed for government adoption at scale. That means tackling the technical complexities head-on and making the process seamless. Sounds simple, but it's exactly what separates projects that survive from those that fade.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NestedFox

· 6h ago

Haha, that's true. But if ADI Chain can really understand the government side thoroughly, then it's a win. The key is whether the execution can keep up with the hype.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractRebel

· 6h ago

Is focusing on one direction really that important? It seems like many projects still fail due to lack of funding.

View OriginalReply0

SerumDegen

· 6h ago

nah the real tell is when a project actually commits to ONE thing... most teams just copium their way through a roadmap they can't execute. ADI's gov focus is either genius or they're about to get rekt by regulatory cascade effects tbh

Reply0

LidoStakeAddict

· 6h ago

Honestly, focusing on one point is much more reliable than trying to do everything. Many projects are greedy and end up failing completely.

View OriginalReply0