The blockchain industry faces a fundamental bottleneck. While Bitcoin processes merely 7 transactions per second and Ethereum handles around 15 TPS on its base layer, conventional payment networks like Visa operate at roughly 1,700 TPS. This performance gap has become the defining challenge for mainstream adoption. Enter Layer-2 networks—the infrastructure layer addressing blockchain’s most pressing scalability trilemma.
Understanding Layer-2: The Infrastructure Renaissance
Layer-2 solutions represent a paradigm shift in how we think about blockchain architecture. Rather than upgrading the foundational layer itself, these protocols operate as secondary frameworks, processing transactions off-chain before settling them on Layer-1. Think of it as creating express toll lanes alongside congested highways—transactions move faster, costs drop dramatically, and the base layer remains secure and stable.
The mechanics are straightforward but powerful: transactions bundle off the main chain, undergo processing through separate validation systems, and eventually settle back on Ethereum or Bitcoin mainnet with cryptographic proof. This architecture delivers three critical benefits: massive throughput increases, transaction fee reduction of 90-95%, and maintained security inheritance from Layer-1.
The Architecture Hierarchy: How Layers Work Together
Layer-1 serves as the immutable foundation—Bitcoin, Ethereum, or other base blockchains where consensus happens and security is anchored.
Layer-2 handles the volume. It’s where most activity occurs, processing thousands of transactions per second while inheriting Layer-1’s security guarantees.
Layer-3 represents specialized execution layers, typically handling application-specific optimization or cross-chain communication needs.
This vertical stacking creates efficiency without sacrificing decentralization. Each layer plays a distinct role in the ecosystem’s health.
The Technical Battleground: Competing Layer-2 Architectures
Different Layer-2 implementations prioritize different trade-offs. Understanding these distinctions matters for both developers and users.
Optimistic Rollups assume transaction validity by default, only triggering verification challenges when disputes arise. This approach reduces computational overhead and speeds up finality. The trade-off: a dispute resolution period (typically 7 days) before funds fully settle.
Zero-Knowledge Rollups bundle transactions into mathematical proofs that verify validity without revealing transaction data. This creates instant finality and enhanced privacy, though the cryptographic overhead is more computationally intensive.
Plasma Chains operate as semi-independent sidechains, settling periodically to the main chain. They offer flexibility for specialized use cases but require more sophisticated exit mechanisms.
Validium combines zero-knowledge validation with off-chain data storage, maximizing throughput while maintaining security through cryptographic proofs.
Each technology represents a different answer to the same question: how do we move volume without compromising security?
The 2025 Layer-2 Landscape: A Competitive Breakdown
Arbitrum: The Market Leader with Growing Competition
Arbitrum captured the Layer-2 market’s imagination early, commanding over 51% of Ethereum Layer-2 TVL as of January 2024. Its Optimistic Rollup implementation achieves 4,000 TPS while reducing gas costs by 95% compared to Ethereum mainnet.
Current Metrics (December 2025):
ARB Token Price: $0.19
Market Cap: $1.09B
Peak Throughput: 4,000 TPS
The network’s strength lies in its developer ecosystem—familiar Ethereum tooling, streamlined deployment, and a maturing DeFi landscape featuring Aave, Uniswap, and GMX. However, recent technical updates and increased Layer-2 competition have diluted its dominance. The transition toward decentralization continues, with governance responsibilities increasingly distributed to ARB token holders.
Optimism: The OP Stack Revolution
Optimism represents a different Layer-2 philosophy—it built infrastructure intended for reuse. The OP Stack enables other teams to launch Layer-2 networks using proven Optimistic Rollup architecture, effectively democratizing Layer-2 deployment.
Current Metrics (December 2025):
OP Token Price: $0.27
Market Cap: $515.57M
Throughput Capacity: 4,000 TPS (peak)
Optimism processes transactions 26x faster than Ethereum while cutting fees by approximately 90%. Its ecosystem includes Velodrome (DEX), Aave, Synthetix, and numerous gaming projects. The OP Stack’s availability means we’ll likely see Optimism-derived chains proliferate, creating a new class of Layer-2 competitors. Optimism’s bet on standardization over customization may prove strategically valuable if adoption follows the path of other open-source protocols.
Lightning Network: Bitcoin’s Scaling Answer
While other Layer-2s focus on Ethereum, the Lightning Network quietly revolutionized Bitcoin scalability. Its bi-directional payment channel architecture enables off-chain Bitcoin transfers without sacrificing self-custody.
Current Metrics:
TVL: $198M+
Theoretical Throughput: 1M+ TPS
Technology: Payment channels with smart contracts
Lightning’s advantage lies in simplicity—users can transact at near-zero fees and instant speed without complex bridges or cross-chain mechanisms. However, adoption remains niche, technical complexity deters casual users, and the channel-based model doesn’t suit all use cases. Despite these limitations, Lightning demonstrates that Layer-2 scaling doesn’t belong exclusively to smart contract chains.
Polygon: The Multichain Scaling Pioneer
Polygon operates as an entire ecosystem rather than a single Layer-2 solution. Its zkEVM implementation prioritizes zero-knowledge rollups, achieving theoretical throughput exceeding 65,000 TPS—dwarfing competitors.
Current Capabilities:
MATIC Token: Used for gas fees, staking, governance
TVL: $4B
Peak Throughput: 65,000 TPS
Polygon’s diversified approach—supporting both zkRollups and Proof-of-Stake sidechains—makes it the Swiss Army knife of Ethereum scaling. Its integration with existing DeFi giants (Aave, Curve, SushiSwap) and NFT marketplaces (OpenSea, Rarible) creates network effects that compound over time. The ecosystem’s maturity makes Polygon the bridge between early adopters and mainstream users.
Base: The Exchange Layer-2
Coinbase’s Base represents a different strategic calculation—leverage Coinbase’s user base, regulatory credibility, and infrastructure expertise to build a Layer-2 optimized for onboarding traditional finance users.
Current Status (December 2025):
TVL: $729M
Throughput Target: 2,000 TPS
Technology: OP Stack (Optimistic Rollups)
Base remains relatively young, but its backing by one of crypto’s largest regulated exchanges suggests staying power. The Layer-2 serves as a practical onboarding point for Coinbase users entering DeFi, NFT trading, and other applications. Its OP Stack foundation means it shares Optimism’s development trajectory while benefiting from Coinbase’s security and user experience expertise.
Manta Network: Privacy-First Layer-2
While other Layer-2s compete on throughput and cost, Manta Network identified a gap: privacy-preserving smart contracts and anonymous transactions at scale.
Current Metrics (December 2025):
MANTA Token Price: $0.07
Market Cap: $33.62M
Peak Throughput: 4,000 TPS
Manta comprises Manta Pacific (EVM-compatible transactions) and Manta Atlantic (private identity management). Its zero-knowledge architecture enables DeFi applications where transaction amounts and counterparties remain concealed—a feature increasingly demanded by institutional users. The network ascended to become the third-largest Ethereum Layer-2 by TVL within months of launch, suggesting that privacy concerns drive real demand.
Immutable X: Gaming’s Dedicated Layer-2
IMX took a specialized approach: optimize Layer-2 specifically for gaming and NFT applications where fast settlement and minimal fees directly impact user experience.
Current Metrics (December 2025):
IMX Token Price: $0.23
Market Cap: $193.69M
Throughput Capacity: 9,000+ TPS
The architecture combines zero-knowledge rollups with custom optimization for NFT minting, trading, and transfer—the most common operations in gaming economies. Immutable X’s ecosystem includes AAA game integrations, major NFT marketplaces, and a growing developer community. This specialization represents a broader Layer-2 trend: generic scaling layers giving way to specialized networks optimized for specific applications.
Starknet: The Cairo Revolution
Starknet employs STARK proofs—a novel zero-knowledge proof system offering theoretical throughput in the millions of TPS. Its custom programming language, Cairo, allows developers to write provable smart contracts directly.
Architecture & Performance:
Throughput: 2,000-4,000 TPS (current), millions theoretically
TVL: $164M
Cryptographic Innovation: STARK proofs
Starknet represents the research frontier of Layer-2 development. Its ambition—proving entire computational states rather than individual transactions—may define the next generation of scaling. However, this sophistication carries tradeoffs: smaller ecosystem, smaller user base, and ongoing protocol upgrades require community adaptation.
Coti: The Privacy Pivot
Coti began as a Cardano scaling solution before pivoting toward becoming a privacy-focused Ethereum Layer-2.
Current Position (December 2025):
COTI Token Price: $0.02
Market Cap: $54.63M
Technology: Transitioning to zk-rollups with EVM compatibility
This transition reflects industry dynamics—Layer-2 developers gravitate toward Ethereum’s liquidity and user base. Coti’s privacy features (garbled circuits ensuring transaction confidentiality) differentiate it, though the migration introduces technical risks alongside opportunities. The architecture aims to maintain privacy while achieving EVM compatibility, a challenging balance.
Dymension: Modular Stacking
Dymension represents emerging Layer-2 philosophy: modularity. Rather than one unified Layer-2, Dymension enables developers to deploy “RollApps”—specialized rollups built for specific applications or communities.
Ecosystem Structure:
Throughput: 20,000 TPS
Architecture: Modular rollups with enshrined rollups
TVL: 10.42M DYM tokens
Each RollApp can customize its consensus mechanism, smart contracts, and data availability layer, optimizing for its specific requirements. This modular stack sacrifices some simplicity for enormous flexibility—an approach gaining attention as Layer-2 competition intensifies and specialization becomes valuable.
The Ethereum 2.0 Factor: How Proto-Danksharding Changes the Game
Ethereum’s roadmap includes Proto-Danksharding, expected to increase the base layer’s throughput to 100,000 TPS by improving data availability for rollups. This upgrade fundamentally reshapes Layer-2 economics.
Implications for existing Layer-2s:
Lower costs consolidate winner-take-most dynamics. As settlement costs decline, Layer-2s can pass these savings directly to users, intensifying competition for TVL and transaction volume.
Enhanced synergy between Layer-1 and Layer-2. Better Ethereum support for rollups means tighter integration, smoother UX, and reduced bridging complexity.
Changing value capture dynamics. Layer-2 tokens derive value from scarcity and governance—as fees compress, governance claims become increasingly important to native token valuations.
Proto-Danksharding doesn’t eliminate Layer-2 necessity; instead, it optimizes the entire stack. Layer-1 handles security and base-layer transactions; Layer-2 handles volume. Together they create an efficient, scalable ecosystem.
Selecting Your Layer-2: A Decision Framework
For maximum throughput and established ecosystem: Arbitrum or Polygon represent proven networks with deep liquidity and diverse applications.
For privacy-conscious users: Manta Network offers full transaction confidentiality at Layer-2 speeds.
For Bitcoin users: Lightning Network remains the most mature off-chain scaling solution, enabling micropayments and everyday transactions.
For gaming and NFTs: Immutable X and Polygon Gaming Studio offer optimized ecosystems for Web3 games.
For institutional entry: Base provides Coinbase’s credibility and user onboarding infrastructure.
For technological frontier exploration: Starknet and Dymension represent next-generation Layer-2 innovation, suitable for developers comfortable with emerging technology.
Conclusion: The Layer-2 Ecosystem Matures
Layer-2 networks have transitioned from experimental technology to foundational infrastructure. The 2025 landscape features established winners (Arbitrum, Optimism), specialized competitors (Immutable X, Manta Network), and technological innovators (Starknet, Dymension). This diversification benefits users—multiple solutions optimize for different needs rather than forcing compromises.
The Layer-2 race isn’t consolidating around a single winner but fragmenting into specialized ecosystems. Gaming applications cluster on Immutable X. Privacy-conscious users migrate to Manta. Bitcoin enthusiasts use Lightning. DeFi power users split between Arbitrum and Polygon based on specific protocol availability.
This fragmentation reflects mature market dynamics. As blockchain technology normalizes, infrastructure specialized for specific use cases outperforms generic scaling solutions. Layer-2 networks represent this evolution—moving beyond “faster blockchain” toward “purpose-built blockchain stacks optimized for their users’ actual needs.”
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The Layer-2 Revolution: Which Scaling Solutions Dominate 2025's Blockchain Ecosystem
The blockchain industry faces a fundamental bottleneck. While Bitcoin processes merely 7 transactions per second and Ethereum handles around 15 TPS on its base layer, conventional payment networks like Visa operate at roughly 1,700 TPS. This performance gap has become the defining challenge for mainstream adoption. Enter Layer-2 networks—the infrastructure layer addressing blockchain’s most pressing scalability trilemma.
Understanding Layer-2: The Infrastructure Renaissance
Layer-2 solutions represent a paradigm shift in how we think about blockchain architecture. Rather than upgrading the foundational layer itself, these protocols operate as secondary frameworks, processing transactions off-chain before settling them on Layer-1. Think of it as creating express toll lanes alongside congested highways—transactions move faster, costs drop dramatically, and the base layer remains secure and stable.
The mechanics are straightforward but powerful: transactions bundle off the main chain, undergo processing through separate validation systems, and eventually settle back on Ethereum or Bitcoin mainnet with cryptographic proof. This architecture delivers three critical benefits: massive throughput increases, transaction fee reduction of 90-95%, and maintained security inheritance from Layer-1.
The Architecture Hierarchy: How Layers Work Together
Layer-1 serves as the immutable foundation—Bitcoin, Ethereum, or other base blockchains where consensus happens and security is anchored.
Layer-2 handles the volume. It’s where most activity occurs, processing thousands of transactions per second while inheriting Layer-1’s security guarantees.
Layer-3 represents specialized execution layers, typically handling application-specific optimization or cross-chain communication needs.
This vertical stacking creates efficiency without sacrificing decentralization. Each layer plays a distinct role in the ecosystem’s health.
The Technical Battleground: Competing Layer-2 Architectures
Different Layer-2 implementations prioritize different trade-offs. Understanding these distinctions matters for both developers and users.
Optimistic Rollups assume transaction validity by default, only triggering verification challenges when disputes arise. This approach reduces computational overhead and speeds up finality. The trade-off: a dispute resolution period (typically 7 days) before funds fully settle.
Zero-Knowledge Rollups bundle transactions into mathematical proofs that verify validity without revealing transaction data. This creates instant finality and enhanced privacy, though the cryptographic overhead is more computationally intensive.
Plasma Chains operate as semi-independent sidechains, settling periodically to the main chain. They offer flexibility for specialized use cases but require more sophisticated exit mechanisms.
Validium combines zero-knowledge validation with off-chain data storage, maximizing throughput while maintaining security through cryptographic proofs.
Each technology represents a different answer to the same question: how do we move volume without compromising security?
The 2025 Layer-2 Landscape: A Competitive Breakdown
Arbitrum: The Market Leader with Growing Competition
Arbitrum captured the Layer-2 market’s imagination early, commanding over 51% of Ethereum Layer-2 TVL as of January 2024. Its Optimistic Rollup implementation achieves 4,000 TPS while reducing gas costs by 95% compared to Ethereum mainnet.
Current Metrics (December 2025):
The network’s strength lies in its developer ecosystem—familiar Ethereum tooling, streamlined deployment, and a maturing DeFi landscape featuring Aave, Uniswap, and GMX. However, recent technical updates and increased Layer-2 competition have diluted its dominance. The transition toward decentralization continues, with governance responsibilities increasingly distributed to ARB token holders.
Optimism: The OP Stack Revolution
Optimism represents a different Layer-2 philosophy—it built infrastructure intended for reuse. The OP Stack enables other teams to launch Layer-2 networks using proven Optimistic Rollup architecture, effectively democratizing Layer-2 deployment.
Current Metrics (December 2025):
Optimism processes transactions 26x faster than Ethereum while cutting fees by approximately 90%. Its ecosystem includes Velodrome (DEX), Aave, Synthetix, and numerous gaming projects. The OP Stack’s availability means we’ll likely see Optimism-derived chains proliferate, creating a new class of Layer-2 competitors. Optimism’s bet on standardization over customization may prove strategically valuable if adoption follows the path of other open-source protocols.
Lightning Network: Bitcoin’s Scaling Answer
While other Layer-2s focus on Ethereum, the Lightning Network quietly revolutionized Bitcoin scalability. Its bi-directional payment channel architecture enables off-chain Bitcoin transfers without sacrificing self-custody.
Current Metrics:
Lightning’s advantage lies in simplicity—users can transact at near-zero fees and instant speed without complex bridges or cross-chain mechanisms. However, adoption remains niche, technical complexity deters casual users, and the channel-based model doesn’t suit all use cases. Despite these limitations, Lightning demonstrates that Layer-2 scaling doesn’t belong exclusively to smart contract chains.
Polygon: The Multichain Scaling Pioneer
Polygon operates as an entire ecosystem rather than a single Layer-2 solution. Its zkEVM implementation prioritizes zero-knowledge rollups, achieving theoretical throughput exceeding 65,000 TPS—dwarfing competitors.
Current Capabilities:
Polygon’s diversified approach—supporting both zkRollups and Proof-of-Stake sidechains—makes it the Swiss Army knife of Ethereum scaling. Its integration with existing DeFi giants (Aave, Curve, SushiSwap) and NFT marketplaces (OpenSea, Rarible) creates network effects that compound over time. The ecosystem’s maturity makes Polygon the bridge between early adopters and mainstream users.
Base: The Exchange Layer-2
Coinbase’s Base represents a different strategic calculation—leverage Coinbase’s user base, regulatory credibility, and infrastructure expertise to build a Layer-2 optimized for onboarding traditional finance users.
Current Status (December 2025):
Base remains relatively young, but its backing by one of crypto’s largest regulated exchanges suggests staying power. The Layer-2 serves as a practical onboarding point for Coinbase users entering DeFi, NFT trading, and other applications. Its OP Stack foundation means it shares Optimism’s development trajectory while benefiting from Coinbase’s security and user experience expertise.
Manta Network: Privacy-First Layer-2
While other Layer-2s compete on throughput and cost, Manta Network identified a gap: privacy-preserving smart contracts and anonymous transactions at scale.
Current Metrics (December 2025):
Manta comprises Manta Pacific (EVM-compatible transactions) and Manta Atlantic (private identity management). Its zero-knowledge architecture enables DeFi applications where transaction amounts and counterparties remain concealed—a feature increasingly demanded by institutional users. The network ascended to become the third-largest Ethereum Layer-2 by TVL within months of launch, suggesting that privacy concerns drive real demand.
Immutable X: Gaming’s Dedicated Layer-2
IMX took a specialized approach: optimize Layer-2 specifically for gaming and NFT applications where fast settlement and minimal fees directly impact user experience.
Current Metrics (December 2025):
The architecture combines zero-knowledge rollups with custom optimization for NFT minting, trading, and transfer—the most common operations in gaming economies. Immutable X’s ecosystem includes AAA game integrations, major NFT marketplaces, and a growing developer community. This specialization represents a broader Layer-2 trend: generic scaling layers giving way to specialized networks optimized for specific applications.
Starknet: The Cairo Revolution
Starknet employs STARK proofs—a novel zero-knowledge proof system offering theoretical throughput in the millions of TPS. Its custom programming language, Cairo, allows developers to write provable smart contracts directly.
Architecture & Performance:
Starknet represents the research frontier of Layer-2 development. Its ambition—proving entire computational states rather than individual transactions—may define the next generation of scaling. However, this sophistication carries tradeoffs: smaller ecosystem, smaller user base, and ongoing protocol upgrades require community adaptation.
Coti: The Privacy Pivot
Coti began as a Cardano scaling solution before pivoting toward becoming a privacy-focused Ethereum Layer-2.
Current Position (December 2025):
This transition reflects industry dynamics—Layer-2 developers gravitate toward Ethereum’s liquidity and user base. Coti’s privacy features (garbled circuits ensuring transaction confidentiality) differentiate it, though the migration introduces technical risks alongside opportunities. The architecture aims to maintain privacy while achieving EVM compatibility, a challenging balance.
Dymension: Modular Stacking
Dymension represents emerging Layer-2 philosophy: modularity. Rather than one unified Layer-2, Dymension enables developers to deploy “RollApps”—specialized rollups built for specific applications or communities.
Ecosystem Structure:
Each RollApp can customize its consensus mechanism, smart contracts, and data availability layer, optimizing for its specific requirements. This modular stack sacrifices some simplicity for enormous flexibility—an approach gaining attention as Layer-2 competition intensifies and specialization becomes valuable.
The Ethereum 2.0 Factor: How Proto-Danksharding Changes the Game
Ethereum’s roadmap includes Proto-Danksharding, expected to increase the base layer’s throughput to 100,000 TPS by improving data availability for rollups. This upgrade fundamentally reshapes Layer-2 economics.
Implications for existing Layer-2s:
Lower costs consolidate winner-take-most dynamics. As settlement costs decline, Layer-2s can pass these savings directly to users, intensifying competition for TVL and transaction volume.
Enhanced synergy between Layer-1 and Layer-2. Better Ethereum support for rollups means tighter integration, smoother UX, and reduced bridging complexity.
Changing value capture dynamics. Layer-2 tokens derive value from scarcity and governance—as fees compress, governance claims become increasingly important to native token valuations.
Proto-Danksharding doesn’t eliminate Layer-2 necessity; instead, it optimizes the entire stack. Layer-1 handles security and base-layer transactions; Layer-2 handles volume. Together they create an efficient, scalable ecosystem.
Selecting Your Layer-2: A Decision Framework
For maximum throughput and established ecosystem: Arbitrum or Polygon represent proven networks with deep liquidity and diverse applications.
For privacy-conscious users: Manta Network offers full transaction confidentiality at Layer-2 speeds.
For Bitcoin users: Lightning Network remains the most mature off-chain scaling solution, enabling micropayments and everyday transactions.
For gaming and NFTs: Immutable X and Polygon Gaming Studio offer optimized ecosystems for Web3 games.
For institutional entry: Base provides Coinbase’s credibility and user onboarding infrastructure.
For technological frontier exploration: Starknet and Dymension represent next-generation Layer-2 innovation, suitable for developers comfortable with emerging technology.
Conclusion: The Layer-2 Ecosystem Matures
Layer-2 networks have transitioned from experimental technology to foundational infrastructure. The 2025 landscape features established winners (Arbitrum, Optimism), specialized competitors (Immutable X, Manta Network), and technological innovators (Starknet, Dymension). This diversification benefits users—multiple solutions optimize for different needs rather than forcing compromises.
The Layer-2 race isn’t consolidating around a single winner but fragmenting into specialized ecosystems. Gaming applications cluster on Immutable X. Privacy-conscious users migrate to Manta. Bitcoin enthusiasts use Lightning. DeFi power users split between Arbitrum and Polygon based on specific protocol availability.
This fragmentation reflects mature market dynamics. As blockchain technology normalizes, infrastructure specialized for specific use cases outperforms generic scaling solutions. Layer-2 networks represent this evolution—moving beyond “faster blockchain” toward “purpose-built blockchain stacks optimized for their users’ actual needs.”