Testing $BEPE in the 100/5 liquidity pool, going single-sided with SOL on spot trading. This kind of concentrated liquidity setup can be interesting for capturing spreads, though it definitely comes with its own risk profile. The single-sided SOL entry keeps things simple compared to balanced pair approaches. Curious to see how this plays out in the current market conditions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PrivacyMaximalist
· 4h ago
Playing BEPE with the 100/5 liquidity pool, I really feel a bit hesitant about this risk profile.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketNoodler
· 4h ago
Playing single-sided SOL with a 100/5 pool... This idea is indeed clever, but you need to carefully consider the slippage, so that you don't end up getting hit by the spread instead of benefiting from it.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 4h ago
A 100/5 liquidity pool sounds quite aggressive. Single-sided SOL entry is indeed straightforward, but I'm worried that a sudden reversal could lead to immediate bankruptcy.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocity
· 4h ago
Playing single-sided SOL with a 100/5 pool? That's an interesting idea, but the waters of concentrated liquidity are quite deep...
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 4h ago
Playing BEPE with the 100/5 liquidity pool, this risk is quite interesting.
Testing $BEPE in the 100/5 liquidity pool, going single-sided with SOL on spot trading. This kind of concentrated liquidity setup can be interesting for capturing spreads, though it definitely comes with its own risk profile. The single-sided SOL entry keeps things simple compared to balanced pair approaches. Curious to see how this plays out in the current market conditions.