The night before, a major exchange announced the listing of LITUSDT perpetual contracts for pre-market trading. The time and price matched the upcoming on-chain contract airdrop on the Lighter exchange, and the listing announcement clearly stated that the target was Lighter Protocol. But as soon as trading opened, the problem arose—the token description turned into Litentry, yet the trading pair price fluctuated around 3.5 to 3.9, which didn't match at all.
What exactly is going on?
The exchange's announcement described Lighter Protocol very clearly—a trading platform focused on perpetual contracts, built on Ethereum, utilizing zero-knowledge aggregation technology, emphasizing low latency and real-time finality. The words were correct, but the information system showed a different token.
Currently, it is suspected that there was a data issue with CoinMarketCap integration, and the exchange has urgently removed the token information page. This move left many users confused—pre-market trading is already risky, and coupled with data chaos, the trading experience plummeted. With Lighter's airdrop imminent, will this blunder affect its market perception? Interested users should keep a close eye.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoCross-TalkClub
· 4h ago
Laughing to death, isn't this the so-called "Zhang Guan Li Dai" package?
---
Playing this set in pre-market trading, it's really the crypto version of "Five Rats Disturb Tokyo."
---
Is there a problem with CoinMarketCap data integration? I wonder if this is helping Lighter do some negative marketing.
---
Pre-market trading is inherently high-risk, and with this wave of chaotic information, retail investors are probably about to take off.
---
A Lighter Protocol, vividly read by the system as Litentry, the data matching is so absurd it’s like a comedy sketch.
---
The speed of deleting information pages is quite fast; I’m just worried that this blunder has already caused many to get liquidated.
---
The airdrop hasn't even landed yet, and there's already an information war. The project team really knows how to market.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 4h ago
Luban is working on construction again, this time directly reversing the contract.
---
In theory, it should be feasible, but as soon as the data is integrated, it becomes another coin, full academic value but negative practical value.
---
Now I’ve mastered it—how to turn Lighter into Litentry, the art of integrating CMC data.
---
Locked myself inside again, pre-market trading mixed with chaotic data, this combo punch is quite powerful.
---
It's just another useless innovation, even the last coin had to be done with so many tricks.
---
This contract is a bit interesting, the announcement and system are out of sync, user experience skyrockets.
---
Just a small experiment? Airdrop is imminent, and doing this kind of thing, market awareness will take a hit.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuy
· 4h ago
Pre-market trading is just gambling, and now they're mixing up different cryptocurrencies... it's outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichVictim
· 4h ago
It's the same old CMC nonsense again. If things get urgent, how many people will get trapped this time?
View OriginalReply0
HodlVeteran
· 4h ago
Oh man, I'm very familiar with this operation. I've seen quite a few such tricks back in 2018.
It's both CMC and mixed tokens; pre-market trading is basically a casino. Now the data is also messed up, which is really adding insult to injury.
I advise everyone, those who haven't suffered losses, not to rush into the market. This kind of rhythm is just digging a pit for the retail investors.
Lighter's recent situation is indeed a bit unfortunate. Encountering this before the airdrop, how much heat must have been lost?
It looks like fishing; smart people have already gotten out.
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRider
· 4h ago
Damn, the data is messy again. This exchange is really outrageous.
The night before, a major exchange announced the listing of LITUSDT perpetual contracts for pre-market trading. The time and price matched the upcoming on-chain contract airdrop on the Lighter exchange, and the listing announcement clearly stated that the target was Lighter Protocol. But as soon as trading opened, the problem arose—the token description turned into Litentry, yet the trading pair price fluctuated around 3.5 to 3.9, which didn't match at all.
What exactly is going on?
The exchange's announcement described Lighter Protocol very clearly—a trading platform focused on perpetual contracts, built on Ethereum, utilizing zero-knowledge aggregation technology, emphasizing low latency and real-time finality. The words were correct, but the information system showed a different token.
Currently, it is suspected that there was a data issue with CoinMarketCap integration, and the exchange has urgently removed the token information page. This move left many users confused—pre-market trading is already risky, and coupled with data chaos, the trading experience plummeted. With Lighter's airdrop imminent, will this blunder affect its market perception? Interested users should keep a close eye.