These past two days, I saw a shocking news story—JD.com's warehouse in Paris was hit by a large-scale theft, with over 50,000 electronic items mysteriously disappearing, resulting in a direct loss of 37 million euros. The thieves were skilled, damaging surveillance and prying open locks, suggesting inside cooperation. A logistics friend put it bluntly: these goods were stolen right after being stocked, clearly targeted for a long time.
This incident made me think of the crypto space. On the surface, they seem unrelated, but in fact, they are both testing the same thing—asset security.
Physical warehouse thefts happen due to security loopholes, and digital assets are no different. Does your wallet have multi-factor authentication? Is the private key stored on cold devices? Are those seemingly secure custody solutions truly decentralized? These are all questions.
In the traditional world, insurance companies compensate for the value of lost goods, but what about lost crypto assets? No one will pay you back. So you need to be more cautious than warehouse managers. Smart contract audits, cold storage, multi-signature wallets, decentralized custody—these are not optional but essential.
Honestly, during market volatility, everyone focuses on price fluctuations, rarely thinking about checking their security measures. But that’s exactly when accidents are most likely to happen. Asset security is not a short-term topic; it’s a long-term bottom line to uphold. What are you doing about it?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WagmiAnon
· 6h ago
The incident at JD Paris warehouse is truly outrageous... 37 million euros are gone, and the insider still couldn't be prevented. This serves as a reminder to me that our private keys must not be careless.
View OriginalReply0
StableGeniusDegen
· 6h ago
The JD Paris warehouse thing is honestly a bit outrageous, but how should I put it, keeping your own coins safe is the way to go. Don't rely on the platform.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessenger
· 6h ago
What does this say about JD's Paris warehouse? An insider, no matter how strong the protection, can't withstand internal and external collusion. Speaking of our crypto circle, isn't it the same? How many people have had their wallets "compromised," and no one compensates at all. Are cold wallets really being used, or are they just sitting there gathering dust?
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobia
· 6h ago
Damn, 37 million euros just gone like that? An insider, huh
---
What does the JD Paris warehouse incident tell us? No matter how big a company is, it can't stop internal greed
---
Reading this news made me think of my private key. I quickly checked my wallet settings and was shocked
---
No insurance, no compensation—this hits the core. We have to save ourselves, brothers
---
The protective measures we promised to implement were forgotten the moment we turned around. We only regret it when something happens
---
That's why I absolutely refuse to use exchange wallets. Cold wallets are always the first choice
---
A feint, on the surface talking about the warehouse but actually warning us not to be reckless
---
Multi-signature wallets really changed me. Otherwise, I might have been gone long ago
---
Alright, that was a pretty good explanation, but ordinary people don't have the leisure to tinker with this stuff every day
---
The loss of 37 million is actually not that bad, but if our coins were stolen, it would really be a life without hope
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 6h ago
Really, internal spies are the most terrifying. This kind of thing is the same on the blockchain; no matter how many audits there are, they can't prevent the contract creator from making small moves. By the way, how long have you kept your cold wallet without checking? I'm most worried about those who say "I'm very secure" and haven't verified their private keys for three years.
View OriginalReply0
LadderToolGuy
· 6h ago
€37 million just disappeared like that, and no one is compensating. That's the most terrifying part.
These past two days, I saw a shocking news story—JD.com's warehouse in Paris was hit by a large-scale theft, with over 50,000 electronic items mysteriously disappearing, resulting in a direct loss of 37 million euros. The thieves were skilled, damaging surveillance and prying open locks, suggesting inside cooperation. A logistics friend put it bluntly: these goods were stolen right after being stocked, clearly targeted for a long time.
This incident made me think of the crypto space. On the surface, they seem unrelated, but in fact, they are both testing the same thing—asset security.
Physical warehouse thefts happen due to security loopholes, and digital assets are no different. Does your wallet have multi-factor authentication? Is the private key stored on cold devices? Are those seemingly secure custody solutions truly decentralized? These are all questions.
In the traditional world, insurance companies compensate for the value of lost goods, but what about lost crypto assets? No one will pay you back. So you need to be more cautious than warehouse managers. Smart contract audits, cold storage, multi-signature wallets, decentralized custody—these are not optional but essential.
Honestly, during market volatility, everyone focuses on price fluctuations, rarely thinking about checking their security measures. But that’s exactly when accidents are most likely to happen. Asset security is not a short-term topic; it’s a long-term bottom line to uphold. What are you doing about it?