2025-12-24 04:20:42

#以太坊行情解读 Think about it, how many people watched Bitcoin rise from a few cents to where it is today and still say, 'this is just a bubble'? And how many people watched Ethereum start the era of smart contracts but never truly got involved? The reason is actually quite simple — it's not an information gap, it's a belief gap. Not believing that code can represent the asset value of gold, not believing that a piece of software can reconstruct the operating logic of the financial world.

What lies before us now is another possibility. There is a project called Bitroot, which does things a bit differently—not only inheriting the core philosophy of its predecessors (code is law) but also incorporating the dimension of AI parallel processing. Sounds impressive? The key is not in the technical parameters, but in how it changes the distribution of power. This time, it’s not the elite from Wall Street deciding the direction, but a return to the most fundamental elements: the genuine consensus of ordinary users, developers, and community participants.

The mainnet testing has begun, what does it mean? It means that we are no longer outsiders watching the live broadcast and scrolling through K-lines. Everyone involved is witnessing and driving the birth of a new standard - not a standard defined by a specific exchange, not a direction decided by a specific foundation, but something forged by the collective wisdom of developers and users.

This is the real turning point. Over the past decade, we have witnessed how code has disrupted finance and created wealth. The question now is: this time, do you want to continue to watch history, or do you really want to get involved?

ETH-0.84%

BTC-0.27%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StakeWhisperer

· 7h ago

The gap in conviction really hit home, but I think more people are just scared of getting cut... I've heard the phrase "power return" from Bitroot too many times, and AI parallel processing sounds impressive, but whether it can actually be implemented depends on the data. However, since the mainnet is already live, we definitely need to follow up and see, anyway, the cost of being a bystander in history is greater. Wait, isn't this another story of "disrupting finance"... Why does every project have the same narrative, haha. I've been hearing "code is law" for ten years, and now I just want to see who can really make this happen, rather than becoming another bunch of victims cut by exchanges. Your community consensus is good, but do ecosystem participants really have a say, or are the big players still calling the shots?

View OriginalReply0

BlockDetective

· 12h ago

Honestly, it's another "this time is different" project... I've heard it too many times. Bitroot is indeed interesting, but when it comes to AI parallel processing, we need to see real data to speak. Mainnet testing launch ≠ truly operational; haven't we learned that lesson before? There's nothing wrong with having strong conviction, but don't mistake FOMO for faith. Code is law, provided the code is bug-free... I have to put a question mark on that. Deciding the direction for ordinary users? Uh... in the end, it still depends on where the capital is pouring money. You're exaggerating a bit, brother. Isn't it better to be more cautious? Witnessing history vs. getting caught in a trap—this line is actually very blurry.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropworkerZhang

· 18h ago

The statement about "belief gap" hit the mark, but to be honest, I still need to look more into Bitroot. AI and consensus again, it always sounds a bit suspicious. Is the mainnet launched? Are they really serious this time? I'm already tired of those "spectator history" comments; making money is the real deal. It's not information gap but belief gap, I agree with that, but the premise is that there must be something that can truly be implemented.

View OriginalReply0

StrawberryIce

· 12-24 04:33

It's the same old rhetoric again... belief gaps, power distribution, collective wisdom; it sounds pretty plausible, but the ones who really make money are always the early birds, right? Why does it feel like we're repeating the same story every time, just changing the project name and starting to hype it up... Bitroot? To be honest, I haven't heard of it, but this kind of "ordinary people participation, Decentralization decision-making" promotional language, I need to take a closer look. It's easy to get involved, but the losses come quickly... better to just observe for now. The most ridiculous part of these articles is the last sentence, directly putting you in a moral dilemma... if you don't participate, are you just a bystander to history? Goodness.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlertBot

· 12-24 04:32

The term "belief gap" is absolutely spot on; it really is the case. It's another new project with a new story. Who will catch a falling knife this time? The mainnet has already launched, so what's the level of decentralization? That's the key point. It seems like a democratic consensus, but in the end, it's still the large investors who call the shots. I've heard "code is law" countless times, but can the law prevent a rug?

View OriginalReply0

MainnetDelayedAgain

· 12-24 04:31

According to the database, how many times has the Bitroot Mainnet test launch been delayed since the last commitment? It is suggested to add a timeline. Waiting for the flowers to bloom, but can you provide a specific date? How long has the project party been drawing the pie of power redistribution? Data supplementation is welcome. It seems to be another round of "this time it's really different"; time will prove everything, or the art of delay. Mainnet test launch ≠ Mainnet launch; this logic is a bit far off.

View OriginalReply0

ExpectationFarmer

· 12-24 04:29

The term "faith difference" hit me hard. To be honest, I didn't enter a position when I saw BTC rise in the early years, and now it seems ridiculous to think about it. Is this Bitroot mainnet test really different? Or is it just another round of Be Played for Suckers? Let's wait and see. However, I've heard the rhetoric of "power returning" too many times. The key is whether it can truly be implemented. Mainnet launch ≠ making money, don't be led by the rhythm everyone. Code can determine wealth, but it can't determine people's hearts, and that is the hardest part. What to participate in? I just want to make money properly, don't feed me motivational nonsense.

View OriginalReply0

SelfSovereignSteve

· 12-24 04:21

The part about faith is really spot on; how many people have missed out just because they lacked confidence? But the rhetoric from Bitroot sounds a bit familiar... I have a good feeling about it, but that's all it is; the mainnet is still in testing. I've heard the phrase "code is law" so many times... can it really be decentralized? With AI backing and consensus, it all sounds right, but I'm just afraid it might be a new trick to play people for suckers. It's easy to get involved, but how can you avoid being played for suckers? That's the real question. What happened to those who said code would disrupt finance over a decade ago? Sorry, but I have to ask that too. Changing the distribution of power? It feels a bit early to say that before the mainnet is launched... The consensus of ordinary users... what about the market makers on the exchange? Are they ordinary users too?

View OriginalReply0