The quantum computing sector is entering uncharted territory. Unlike previous cycles driven by theoretical potential, 2025 marks the year when real contracts, measurable revenue and institutional capital finally converged. Three public quantum players—D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), IonQ (IONQ), and Rigetti Computing (RGTI)—are positioned differently to capitalize on this shift, each with distinct competitive advantages and execution risks.
The Money Trail Tells the Real Story
Investment capital doesn’t lie. According to a June 2025 McKinsey analysis, private and public investors deployed nearly $2.0 billion into quantum technology startups in 2024, representing a 50% surge from $1.3 billion in 2023. This acceleration reflects a fundamental shift: the market is no longer speculating on quantum’s potential—it’s betting on near-term commercialization.
The clearest signal comes from Honeywell’s Quantinuum partnership, which recently closed a $600 million funding round at a $10 billion valuation. This isn’t venture capital chasing moonshots. This is institutional money pricing in an imminent IPO and sector re-rating. When mega-cap industrial players anchor billion-dollar valuations, the quantum narrative transforms from “if it works” to “when it scales.”
QBTS: The Quiet Profitability Play
D-Wave Quantum doubled third-quarter 2025 revenues to $3.7 million year-over-year, but the headline number misses the operational inflection. Bookings expanded sequentially, driven by repeat enterprise customers deploying annealing solutions across logistics and manufacturing optimization workflows.
More importantly, D-Wave tightened adjusted losses while gross margins strengthened on higher cloud platform utilization. The company entered the final quarter with an improved liquidity position—the hallmark of a business transitioning from cash burn to sustainable operations.
The 2026 outlook is compelling: analysts project 61.3% revenue growth on 14.6% earnings expansion. For a quantum pure-play, this combination of acceleration and profitability improvement is rare. QBTS represents the “show-me-the-path-to-GAAP-profitability” trade.
IONQ: The Cash Engine with Engineering Credibility
IonQ’s execution is undeniable. Third-quarter 2025 revenues surged 222% year-over-year, with management raising full-year 2025 guidance to $106-$110 million. This isn’t just growth—it’s proof that customers are deploying quantum systems across both cloud and hardware channels simultaneously.
The technical milestone announced this quarter—achieving two-qubit gate fidelity exceeding 99.99%—matters because it’s measurable, independently verifiable, and directly correlates to error rates that enterprise customers evaluate before committing multi-year contracts.
Combined with a fortress balance sheet from recent financings, IonQ possesses both execution runway and credibility. The 2026 consensus calls for 70.2% earnings growth on 64.3% revenue growth—the highest quality growth profile in the quantum cohort. IONQ is the lowest-execution-risk play for investors seeking exposure without quantum volatility.
RGTI: The Asymmetric Bet
Rigetti reported only $1.9 million in Q3 2025 revenue, reflecting its position as the earliest-stage commercial operator among the three. This would normally signal caution. Instead, the balance sheet tells a different story: Rigetti ended Q3 with $558.9 million in cash, reaching approximately $600 million by November following warrant exercises.
That war chest funds an ambitious architectural pivot. Rigetti’s modular, chiplet-based systems roadmap—including its 18 modular switch board design elements—targets a 1,000+ qubit system by 2027. If the Ankaa-chiplet architecture delivers on scaling milestones, the equity could re-rate sharply.
The 2026 projections underscore the optionality: 185.6% revenue growth with 75.9% earnings expansion. These figures assume successful execution on hardware milestones. Rigetti isn’t the “safest” quantum bet—but it carries the highest potential upside if architectural innovations prove commercially viable.
The Setup for 2026
Three distinct risk-reward profiles now define quantum investing:
Conservative: IonQ offers visibility, profitability trajectory, and near-term revenue acceleration.
Balanced: D-Wave combines margin improvement with repeat customer validation across enterprise use cases.
Aggressive: Rigetti’s cash position and architectural roadmap create potential for significant re-rating if 2026 engineering milestones are achieved.
The quantum sector’s evolution from speculation to commercialization creates a rare window. For investors considering portfolio exposure, these three companies represent the vanguard of quantum’s transition from laboratory to balance sheet. The next 12 months will determine which execution models prevail when the technology finally meets real-world deployment at scale.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Quantum Computing's Turning Point: Three Stocks Ready for Commercial Breakthrough in 2026
The quantum computing sector is entering uncharted territory. Unlike previous cycles driven by theoretical potential, 2025 marks the year when real contracts, measurable revenue and institutional capital finally converged. Three public quantum players—D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), IonQ (IONQ), and Rigetti Computing (RGTI)—are positioned differently to capitalize on this shift, each with distinct competitive advantages and execution risks.
The Money Trail Tells the Real Story
Investment capital doesn’t lie. According to a June 2025 McKinsey analysis, private and public investors deployed nearly $2.0 billion into quantum technology startups in 2024, representing a 50% surge from $1.3 billion in 2023. This acceleration reflects a fundamental shift: the market is no longer speculating on quantum’s potential—it’s betting on near-term commercialization.
The clearest signal comes from Honeywell’s Quantinuum partnership, which recently closed a $600 million funding round at a $10 billion valuation. This isn’t venture capital chasing moonshots. This is institutional money pricing in an imminent IPO and sector re-rating. When mega-cap industrial players anchor billion-dollar valuations, the quantum narrative transforms from “if it works” to “when it scales.”
QBTS: The Quiet Profitability Play
D-Wave Quantum doubled third-quarter 2025 revenues to $3.7 million year-over-year, but the headline number misses the operational inflection. Bookings expanded sequentially, driven by repeat enterprise customers deploying annealing solutions across logistics and manufacturing optimization workflows.
More importantly, D-Wave tightened adjusted losses while gross margins strengthened on higher cloud platform utilization. The company entered the final quarter with an improved liquidity position—the hallmark of a business transitioning from cash burn to sustainable operations.
The 2026 outlook is compelling: analysts project 61.3% revenue growth on 14.6% earnings expansion. For a quantum pure-play, this combination of acceleration and profitability improvement is rare. QBTS represents the “show-me-the-path-to-GAAP-profitability” trade.
IONQ: The Cash Engine with Engineering Credibility
IonQ’s execution is undeniable. Third-quarter 2025 revenues surged 222% year-over-year, with management raising full-year 2025 guidance to $106-$110 million. This isn’t just growth—it’s proof that customers are deploying quantum systems across both cloud and hardware channels simultaneously.
The technical milestone announced this quarter—achieving two-qubit gate fidelity exceeding 99.99%—matters because it’s measurable, independently verifiable, and directly correlates to error rates that enterprise customers evaluate before committing multi-year contracts.
Combined with a fortress balance sheet from recent financings, IonQ possesses both execution runway and credibility. The 2026 consensus calls for 70.2% earnings growth on 64.3% revenue growth—the highest quality growth profile in the quantum cohort. IONQ is the lowest-execution-risk play for investors seeking exposure without quantum volatility.
RGTI: The Asymmetric Bet
Rigetti reported only $1.9 million in Q3 2025 revenue, reflecting its position as the earliest-stage commercial operator among the three. This would normally signal caution. Instead, the balance sheet tells a different story: Rigetti ended Q3 with $558.9 million in cash, reaching approximately $600 million by November following warrant exercises.
That war chest funds an ambitious architectural pivot. Rigetti’s modular, chiplet-based systems roadmap—including its 18 modular switch board design elements—targets a 1,000+ qubit system by 2027. If the Ankaa-chiplet architecture delivers on scaling milestones, the equity could re-rate sharply.
The 2026 projections underscore the optionality: 185.6% revenue growth with 75.9% earnings expansion. These figures assume successful execution on hardware milestones. Rigetti isn’t the “safest” quantum bet—but it carries the highest potential upside if architectural innovations prove commercially viable.
The Setup for 2026
Three distinct risk-reward profiles now define quantum investing:
Conservative: IonQ offers visibility, profitability trajectory, and near-term revenue acceleration.
Balanced: D-Wave combines margin improvement with repeat customer validation across enterprise use cases.
Aggressive: Rigetti’s cash position and architectural roadmap create potential for significant re-rating if 2026 engineering milestones are achieved.
The quantum sector’s evolution from speculation to commercialization creates a rare window. For investors considering portfolio exposure, these three companies represent the vanguard of quantum’s transition from laboratory to balance sheet. The next 12 months will determine which execution models prevail when the technology finally meets real-world deployment at scale.