2025-12-23 14:00:14

#BTC资金流动性 Is the gold you deposit in the bank really yours?

This question sounds absurd, but when you break it down, it hits hard. When you buy, you pay real money, and the bank gives you a certificate—you think this is proof of ownership. But once the bank is at risk, what does this piece of paper rely on to exchange back for an equivalent amount of gold? No one dares to guarantee it.

What if you insist on taking physical gold bars? It's not easy either. Once your fingerprint is on it, if it gets scratched even a little, the bank can confidently refuse to accept it—saying things like "quality has declined, cannot be resold." Ironically, the central bank accepts scratched banknotes without hesitation, but gold has become as fragile as a porcelain doll.

The logic behind it is actually very clear: the voucher model makes you forever reliant on the bank's credit endorsement, while the physical model ties your hands and feet with the "perfect preservation standard." The bank is playing an invisible game — your gold seems to be in your hands, but it actually still exists within the rules they set.

At this point, looking at Bitcoin becomes interesting. There are no certificates, no fear of scratches, and having the private key in hand means complete ownership—international transfers only require a string of passwords. It sounds much freer. But the risks are also apparent: without intermediary endorsement, there’s no one to back you up. Although the liquidity of these currencies like $BTC, $ETH, and $BNB is improving, market volatility and technical risks still exist.

What does it mean to have wealth that "truly belongs to you"? Perhaps there is no perfect answer. Gold gives you a tangible feeling, but rules are restrictive; crypto assets give you code-level freedom, but market volatility.

Instead of getting caught up in which is more "real," it's better to ask yourself: Are you willing to bear the full cost behind ownership?

BTC0.35%

ETH-0.03%

BNB-0.66%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

probably_nothing_anon

· 8h ago

The tricks of banks have long been seen through. In plain words, it's just a new way to cut leeks. --- The private key is the real golden bell shield; there's no escaping that. --- Gold being "scratched" and refused? That's just too absurd. Banks are really clever. --- Ultimately, it's a trust issue, but trust in the crypto world is also unreliable, my friend. --- So only those who hold the private key can truly claim the wealth as their own; everything else is虚. --- Centralized institutions are just betting that you won't actually verify. They're too cunning. --- Whether it's gold or crypto, the key is that you can keep it safe yourself—that's the core. --- Seeing through the tricks of banks, looking back, Bitcoin is indeed more attractive. --- It's just a trade-off; freedom and risk always come down to choosing one or the other.

View OriginalReply0

BrokenDAO

· 12-24 09:36

It's all just a game theory problem. The bank's rules restrict you, and the volatility of self-custodied coins also restricts you—it's the same old story, just different packaging. It all depends on who you are willing to be exploited by. --- Credential dependence is institutional inertia, self-managed private keys are incentive distortions—no matter which you choose, you're trapped. --- To put it simply, centralization kills you with rules, decentralization kills you with the market—it's just double kill. --- The most ironic thing is that no one has actually implemented a governance mechanism with genuine rights and checks, so there's no real answer to this problem. --- Regarding trust costs, banks openly price them, while the crypto world secretly exploits retail investors—at least the former can be sued.

View OriginalReply0

fren_with_benefits

· 12-23 14:30

I have seen through the bank's tricks a long time ago; the certificate is just a guise, and they won't budge an inch at critical moments. It's still best to hodl the Private Key myself; although there is a lot of Fluctuation, this is the true freedom.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-c799715c

· 12-23 14:30

The banking system is indeed absurd; it's better to hold onto gold yourself. However, if you lose your Private Key, no one will help you recover it.

View OriginalReply0

tokenomics_truther

· 12-23 14:29

The bank's rhetoric has long been seen through; the certificate is just a shackle. The Private Key is true freedom; although there are large Fluctuations, at least fate is in one's own hands.

View OriginalReply0

TokenRationEater

· 12-23 14:29

The bank's rhetoric is really amazing; a certificate is just a certificate, and gold is just gold. Anyway, they are definitely going to win. --- Even holding the Private Key, one still has to worry about the exchange's big dump; no one can be completely free. --- Why can banks treat scratched gold bars as scrap, while paper money is still accepted? This logic is really ridiculous. --- To put it bluntly, we are all being choked; whether it's a certificate or code, no one can escape the risk. --- It feels like the whole gold system is a game rule written by the banks, and we are just the trapped pieces. --- It mainly depends on whether you can hold on; when the crypto world experiences a big dump, the mentality collapses completely. --- So the gold in the vault is essentially also IOI, with no fundamental difference from the coins on the exchange. --- This article is right; perfect ownership doesn't really exist; it's just a matter of choosing which cost is more acceptable.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 12-23 14:16

I've seen through the bank's tricks a long time ago, but self-custody isn't that sexy... on-chain footprints will speak for themselves. --- If we're talking about ownership, we should first ask ourselves what to do if the private key is lost, that's the biggest risk. --- The rules of being trapped in gold are similar to coins being manipulated by the market... there's no essential difference, they're all games designed by people. --- The golden value hidden in the sleeping wallet has long been divided up by certain large investors, have you noticed? --- Certificates, private keys, physical assets... to put it bluntly, they're all illusions, the key is who controls the fund transfer trajectory. --- The logic behind the suspicious fund flows is much more complex than this issue, banks are just the surface market makers.

View OriginalReply0

MoodFollowsPrice

· 12-23 14:14

The bank's tricks have long been seen through; it's still best to hold coins yourself to feel secure.

View OriginalReply0