#数字资产市场洞察 Bitcoin has stalled at the critical level of $81,300.
According to on-chain data platforms, this price level is the true market equilibrium point for Bitcoin. Its significance goes far beyond that—it separates two different market trends: a slow time decay correction or a more intense sell-off wave. Since October, the importance of this level has become even more apparent.
Why? Because the data is clear: over the past three months, especially after the flash crash on October 10, the correlation between large-cap cryptocurrencies and Bitcoin has remained high. They are almost tied together. Bitcoin has become the "bellwether" for the entire market.
This raises a question. What if Bitcoin continues to fall below this true mean? The impact won't be limited to the weaker altcoins. Historical data reveals a pattern: when Bitcoin runs below this level for an extended period, selling pressure tends to spread like a virus across the market.
The situation is even more complex now. Large-cap assets still move in sync with Bitcoin. High-volatility tokens have already experienced a first drop. Once the price falls below $81,300, this weakness is likely to spread back to core assets.
This is not about promoting some "market collapse theory." On the contrary, it defines where the market's balance point is. As long as Bitcoin stays above this mean, losses in the market will continue to be uneven. Long-tail assets may fall on their own, but core assets can hold.
But what if the $81,300 defense line is completely breached and cannot be quickly recovered? Past data shows that selling pressure will spread from the "long tail" to a larger scope. In this environment of thin liquidity and highly correlated large-cap assets, the result is a transition from a slow, suppressed correction to a more orderly, collective adjustment.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProveMyZK
· 12-21 19:41
81300 must be defended, otherwise the entire market data will be done for.
---
It's the same old "long wick candle" saying, I'm tired of hearing it.
---
emm, it simply means that if Bitcoin falls, everything falls, it's not that complicated.
---
With such high correlation, what's the point? It feels like those trapped are going down together.
---
That flash crash in October really messed up the rhythm, now everything moves with BTC.
---
To put it bluntly, it's a gamble on whether BTC can hold 81300; if it holds, there can be a breather; if it breaks, it's over.
---
In this thin liquidity market, once the selling pressure spreads, there’s really no one who can stop it.
---
Core assets can't hold out for too long either; in the end, they will all fall together.
---
I'm a bit worried about the sisters holding long-tail coins; it feels like they are already starting to bleed.
---
How fast will the defense line break? Historically speaking.
---
Bitcoin has really become the lifeblood of the entire ecosystem, and that's not a good signal.
View OriginalReply0
MindsetExpander
· 12-21 07:06
If this hurdle of 81300 is truly broken, it’s probably game over.
---
Bitcoin is the current stabilizing force; its movement affects everything, and there’s nothing new about that.
---
As long as it holds above the average, it can survive. Once it breaks down, the selling pressure will be overwhelming; the logic is sound.
---
To put it bluntly, it’s a gamble here, betting whether it can hold this key price level.
---
It’s not surprising if the long wick candles die first; what’s truly concerning is if the contagion spreads to core assets, that would be a disaster.
---
With liquidity so thin, the high correlation is like a ticking time bomb, ready to explode at any moment.
---
After the flash crash in October, this position has indeed become a life-or-death line.
---
Rather than listening to analyses, it’s better to see if the data is misleading; 81300 will reveal the truth.
---
The entire market is being held hostage by Bitcoin; no matter how it moves, it’s uncomfortable for everyone.
---
Whether it’s a slow pullback or a collective adjustment, it all depends on how many days this 80,000+ can hold.
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 12-20 10:01
Is the 81,300 level really that sacred? Feels like it's been played out a bit.
---
It's both a balancing point and a stabilizing anchor, hearing this gives me a headache. Let's see how BTC chooses.
---
Viral spread... a bit exaggerated, huh? We also need to consider market sentiment when looking at historical patterns.
---
Long-tail assets falling on their own, core assets holding steady? Ha, I don't quite buy that. Liquidity isn't something that cares about such distinctions.
---
A defensive line failure means a collective adjustment? How do you estimate the probability of a rebound? There's no data to support that.
---
One price level can trap the entire market? Honestly, I can't buy that logic.
---
Thin liquidity means an inevitable synchronized crash? Hmm, seems like we're missing some key conditions.
---
After that flash crash in October, it hasn't recovered. Now claiming to hold the position feels like armchair strategizing after the fact.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanboy42
· 12-19 00:08
Is the 81,300 really that critical? It feels like every time people say if it can't hold, it's the end, but then it keeps bouncing back.
If it breaks, it breaks. Anyway, altcoins have already gone through a round of death, whether Bitcoin can hold up or not depends on what the institutions think.
It sounds pretty scary, but historical data is always clearest in the rearview mirror.
The high correlation is really annoying. It feels like whenever Bitcoin moves, the whole market trembles, lacking any independence.
Instead of obsessing over 81,300, it's better to think about when a real buy-in will appear.
View OriginalReply0
MeltdownSurvivalist
· 12-19 00:07
81300 this point, to put it simply, depends on whether BTC is willing to break the defense. If it breaks, it feels like total annihilation...
Wait, do you guys think this data is real? It feels a bit like over-interpretation.
The spreading of sell orders... I've heard it too many times haha.
So now it's just a gamble that BTC can hold? I bet it can't hold.
Is such a high correlation really a good thing? It feels like being kidnapped.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 12-19 00:05
81300 this threshold is really holding back, it feels like testing the market bottom line
Forget about mean reversion, I just want to know if the institutions are trying to support the market or dump it today
Long-tail coins have long been dead, now it's just a matter of how long big brother Bitcoin can hold up
View OriginalReply0
BoredApeResistance
· 12-19 00:04
Is this 81,300 line really so sacred? It seems like I hear similar statements every time.
If it breaks down, it breaks down. Anyway, I've already prepared myself mentally; I can afford the loss.
The real issue is poor liquidity. Once big players start selling off, retail investors can't even escape.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 12-18 23:51
Is this 81,300 line really so sacred? Feels like every time it's said, the price still drops.
Breaking the level again and again—can it hold this time?
It should have dropped long ago; those who bought at high levels are still dreaming.
With such strong correlation, it might actually be more dangerous. It’s more satisfying when they all fall together.
Bitcoin, this safety net, I think it probably can't hold up either.
High correlation also means higher risk; no one can escape.
It's quite scary to say, but if it really breaks, there will probably be some bottom-fishing.
What can the data from these past few months really represent? The next wave might just reverse.
When liquidity is thin, it's easiest to cause a crash. I'm a bit worried.
The long tail dying first is a proven pattern; now it's the big coins' turn.
#数字资产市场洞察 Bitcoin has stalled at the critical level of $81,300.
According to on-chain data platforms, this price level is the true market equilibrium point for Bitcoin. Its significance goes far beyond that—it separates two different market trends: a slow time decay correction or a more intense sell-off wave. Since October, the importance of this level has become even more apparent.
Why? Because the data is clear: over the past three months, especially after the flash crash on October 10, the correlation between large-cap cryptocurrencies and Bitcoin has remained high. They are almost tied together. Bitcoin has become the "bellwether" for the entire market.
This raises a question. What if Bitcoin continues to fall below this true mean? The impact won't be limited to the weaker altcoins. Historical data reveals a pattern: when Bitcoin runs below this level for an extended period, selling pressure tends to spread like a virus across the market.
The situation is even more complex now. Large-cap assets still move in sync with Bitcoin. High-volatility tokens have already experienced a first drop. Once the price falls below $81,300, this weakness is likely to spread back to core assets.
This is not about promoting some "market collapse theory." On the contrary, it defines where the market's balance point is. As long as Bitcoin stays above this mean, losses in the market will continue to be uneven. Long-tail assets may fall on their own, but core assets can hold.
But what if the $81,300 defense line is completely breached and cannot be quickly recovered? Past data shows that selling pressure will spread from the "long tail" to a larger scope. In this environment of thin liquidity and highly correlated large-cap assets, the result is a transition from a slow, suppressed correction to a more orderly, collective adjustment.